• Count042@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Genocide is genocide.

    Harm reduction arguments only work to a point. If genocide is still the outcome, then it isn’t really harm reduction.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      If we’re here now, then the harm reduction arguments worked while the plan didn’t.

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          We are now in a scenario where we’ll settle for a genocidal monster, because we keep voting for harm reduction. Harm reduction failed in practice; it was never a good idea in the first place.