That entire instance is infested with a massive amount of right-wing hate, transphobia, homophobia, and ugly political vitriol under the guise of “allowing free speech”, rising to the same level or worse than lemmygrad (which we have already defederated from for obvious reasons). Please get this garbage off of the “all” page given that the entire instance actively breaks the rules of lemmy.one and is only providing them with a larger platform. I think a few trolls may have already spilled over.

just take a 20 second scroll through this mess or any of the other communities there: https://lemmy.one/c/dankmemes@exploding-heads.com

    • subigo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      All the downvotes to this comment are ridiculous. Everyone on this site has the ability to block any instance they want. Want “X” instance off your front page? Guess what, you can do that with the click of a button.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not a feature. If you want to block an entire instance, you have to appeal to an admin to defederate, or you have to run your own instance and add them to your blacklist

        • JasSmith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or you just block any communities from the instance you don’t like. It’s slightly less convenient than one button for the whole instance, but it does the same thing.

            • subigo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              TIL. It kind of blows my mind that Lemmy doesn’t have this feature. It seems like one of the first things you would provide to users when building something in the Fediverse.

            • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              True, but the important point should be that this feature is implemented elsewhere, so that should probably be brought over, giving users the ability to dictate the content they view.

    • JasSmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand why you were downvoted. Lemmy gives us all the tools we need to block communities and users we don’t want to see. Is that not good enough? Do they want to control the experience for everyone else as well? Bunch of authoritarians in here.

      • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly this. People have the tools and abilities to block these communities and domains if they don’t want to see that content. Pulling out the de-federation ban-hammer whenever you personally aren’t keen on the content isn’t a reasonable solution.

          • empireOfLove@lemmy.oneOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            yeah how dare I want to tell homophobes to shut the hell up. It’s so controlling and authoritarian, oh no.

            edit: and what exactly are we “controlling” anyway? All this would do is support the ruleset that exists on lemmy.one. If you want to go take part in that hate, go sign up with exploding-heads; it will continue to exist, we just will not be providing a larger platform for them.

      • sacredbirdman@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy also gives you the possibility to set up your own instance and choose your own rules and who you federate with…

        • JasSmith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. If OP wants to defederated, they should go and set up their own instance. Why are they trying to control the experience for everyone else?

          • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Probably because they’ve seen content they don’t like and instead of taking the personal responsibility of blocking it themselves, they want it done at the federation level.

            • empireOfLove@lemmy.oneOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              More like I joined this instance because I agreed with its ruleset, and want to support this instances’ further success by alerting admins to major moderation issues before they snowball into a big problem.

              The admin agreed, so sucks to your “free speech”.

      • bug@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They weren’t downvoted, this instance doesn’t even allow downvotes

        • JasSmith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have 26 downvotes. You have two. You don’t see them because your instance doesn’t let you see them. We can see them from other instances.

          • bug@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Interesting, my understanding was that instances with no downvoting didn’t store any downvotes at all, so they would only exist in the instance of the user who made them, i.e. 26 people from your instance have downvoted that comment but there’s no info from other instances, is that not the case?

            • JasSmith@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah, that is interesting. Maybe that’s exactly how it works. I’m learning something new about Lemmy every day.