• Bardfinn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you want a phone that self destructs when it gets wet? Apple engineers have thought this through.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We had phones with replaceable batteries for a long time. Many of them were waterproof, but none of them exploded on contact with water.

    • Osa-Eris-Xero512@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes they have, which tells me no engineers were consulted for this statement. Waterproofing and replaceable batteries is a trivial combination.

      • 🦘min0nim🦘@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is simply not the case. Saying it’s ‘trivial’ is like saying it’s trivial to travel to Mars because we’ve sent things there before. Reliably sealing anything with a joint is far from trivial.

      • Bardfinn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is this subreddit run by samshit employees or something? Nobody did waterproofing well before Apple started the trend.

    • _haha_oh_wow_@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Waterproof phones with replaceable batteries are most certainly possible and have existed for over a decade at least. Sorry, but that argument is total bullshit.