EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

  • chocolatine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You can read the dawn of everything book which is a very interesting take at a lot of those assumptions which are indeed false. This book goes deep into the ideological bias scientists have when interpreting evidence.

    • balderdash@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      the ideological bias scientists have when interpreting evidence

      Surprised you didn’t get downvoted here. It’s like if you tell people science is done by humans and humans arre flawed people flip out and call you a science-denier.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The scientific term is bias, the layman term is flawed. When interpreting skepticism from others, many are likely to be biased against the layman 😉