Rust is a memory-safe language. So in this case, it could result in more stable software.

I personally like rust, so I get excited when cool things are done with it because each one makes rust just that much bigger, which leads to it being made that much better.

I see projects like that as more of a statement that “rust can do it” than anything.

I want the newest, best software. Is that uncommon? Modern rewrites are often much better than their age-old counterparts since the tech got better over time, compare for example grep vs ripgrep, or find vs fd. The rewrites are much faster and user-friendlier

Memory corruption bugs account for a majority of cve’s in the linux kernel