floofloof@lemmy.ca to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 months agoGoogle will no longer hold onto people's location data in Google Maps — meaning it can't turn that info over to the policewww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1463arrow-down15cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1458arrow-down1external-linkGoogle will no longer hold onto people's location data in Google Maps — meaning it can't turn that info over to the policewww.businessinsider.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square57fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squareSuckMyWang@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months agoWhat have google ever done to not trust them?
minus-squarejennwiththesea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months agoThat means that you’re the product
minus-squaresilentknyght@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoIt’s believable. If 25% of the warrants they receive are for location data, there is a shed load of money to be saved by simply not storing it. Probably simple math, whether or not the stored location data is more valuable than the cost of legal compliance.
I’m not buying it.
What have google ever done to not trust them?
That means that you’re the product
It’s believable. If 25% of the warrants they receive are for location data, there is a shed load of money to be saved by simply not storing it.
Probably simple math, whether or not the stored location data is more valuable than the cost of legal compliance.