Mirror:

Source: https://t.me/pravdaGerashchenko_en/29597

“If Putin wins in Ukraine, there is real risk that his aggression will not end there. Our support is not charity. It is an investment in our security,” - NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.

“The only way to reach a just and lasting solution is to convince President Putin that they will not win on the battlefield,” @jensstoltenberg continued.

“And the only way to ensure that President Putin realises that he is not winning on the battlefield is to continue to support Ukraine.”

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Here’s a not entirely implausible scenario:

    1. Putin ‘wins’ in Ukraine.
    2. Trump wins or ‘wins’ the election.
    3. President Trump (again) says he won’t protect European NATO allies.
    4. NATO is effectively dead. The US nuclear umbrella no longer protects Europe.
    5. An emboldened Putin, engages in constant provocations and distractions.
    6. Some EU members are forced to drastically increase defense spending. Others come to the conclusion that acquiring a nuclear deterrent is now a necessity. Populist Putin verstehers win elections in some European countries, in part thanks to support from an emboldened Kremlin, promising to reduce defense spending. The EU project effectively dies. Europe is divided.
    7. A large part of the EU now kowtows to China.
    8. Because Europe is weakened, Putin continues to cause provocations and a miscalculation is made OR Russia deliberately invades the Suwalki gap (which is already indefensible now), thereby connect Kaliningrad with Russia. Putin’s allies have regularly suggested that this is part of the plan.
    9. Europe is now at war with Russia. The US does not intervene, because of Trump or his isolationist successor.
    10. Europe is weakened from decades of underinvestment, weapons caches are depleted having supported Ukraine, Europe hasn’t had enough time (or will) to properly re-arm, Europe is divided, it is not clear who will protect who.
    11. Certain European countries feel existentially threatened. They have no conventional military response to Russian aggression. Russia is making steady gains.
    12. Some European countries still have a non-conventional military response.
    13. A nuclear war starts in Europe.
    14. Most importantly for American readers, this significantly raises fuel prices.
    15. Half the population blames a long dead Biden and soy based diets.
    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      I almost completely agree with you. Except the last point. We’ll blame who’s ever in charge at the moment. Just like how Trump’s legacy fucked up our current situation, but we’ll blame Biden because he’s at the helm. Imo American short sightedness is the root cause of all of this.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s because Americans are dumb. You should be more like us Europeans and blame foreigners, migrants and supranational institutions like the EU which are preventing our magnificent national politicians from putting ‘our’ people first. /s

        sigh

    • volodymyr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is brilliant, exactly what I was thinking. Knowing russians and Russia very closely, this is a very likely scenario if Russia prevails in the next few months.

      Rewarding Russia now is bringing much more war very soon. Unfortunately there is a disagreement on this fact even between well-intended people who genuinely want peace.

    • WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I just can’t imagine that so many americans want Trump to win and suck each others dick with Putin. Like, yeah, let your good old enemy get stronger, conquer Europe and…simply get stronger? Is that what americans want? Stronger Russia?

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Just this one thing, because it’s rightfully mine, but then you have nothing to fear from me.”

    –Putin in Ukraine, 2014

    “Just this one thing, because it’s rightfully mine, but then you have nothing to fear from me.”

    –Putin in Ukraine 2022

    “Just this one thing, because it’s rightfully mine, but then you have nothing to fear from me.”

    –Putin at your doorstep, near future

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A lot of people either never saw or have forgotten the statements and clues that Russia does not plan to stop.

    They’ve repeatedly said they want to take back the Baltic countries. That’s why there’s an American unit stationed there now. Invasion plans included Moldova. Every border country except Hungary has reported Russian attempts to create civil unrest.

    It’s obvious the Russians think they can avoid an article 5 declaration by having a country “voluntarily” leave NATO and join CSTO. This was in fact their plan for Ukraine, just with the EU instead. Their puppet got elected with massive amounts of misinformation, a vulnerable incumbent (his corruption was exposed), and promises to keep the country in the process of joining the EU. It was the reversal of joining the EU to instead sign treaties with Russia that triggered the Maidan. And then Putin reacted with Crimea and the Donbas region.

    That’s also part of a very old Russian playbook meant to keep countries from joining NATO. Because NATO doesn’t allow countries to join if they have territorial disputes going on. That’s why so many Eastern European countries have territorial disputes with Russian aligned separatists.

    • andxz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re completely correct. That said, and being Finnish, they can fucking try to bring it. We even have the correct amount of snow atm.

      Joking aside, nobody sane wants ww3, but if we had to we’d show them another thing altogether.

  • DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    Did Hitler stop at the sudetenland? Did he stop at Poland? Putin is following his playbook play by play, why would he stop?

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not just an investment but a really good one, with the cost in blood being paid by someone else. I don’t understand why the usually hawkish Republicans don’t see this. Is it just because Biden supports it? I wonder if they would be demanding intervention in Ukraine if Biden had decided to stay neutral…

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Liberals, and actual patriots, see what’s happening in Ukraine and say, “This is terrible! It’s an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation!”

      Fascists see it as, “Hey there sexy mama. You wanna kill all those ‘other’ people?”

      The alt right has firmly placed itself as a voting bloc within the Republican party so yeah…fascist gonna fascism.

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Please look up the definition of fascism and stop throwing “fascism” at everything that isn’t.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Hi. I studied political ideology in college. The GOP qualifies as Fascist. They have a cult of personality; autocratic ideals; a chosen enemy; hierarchical wealth, race, and gender beliefs; and strong beliefs in subordinating oneself for the collective good that routinely turns out to be just whatever is good for the guys on top.

          The people ringing the alarms now aren’t the kind of person to put the F word on a protest sign because the town council decided to ban a couple books.

          Edit to add- They’ve literally openly talked about subverting our Democracy to stay in power. They tried to have a palace coup on January 6th. They’ve given themselves the power to take over certifying votes in districts designated by a state legislature or committee. They even tried to ask SCOTUS to rule that the state legislature was the only legitimate power in elections. Cutting out the entire election system and state supreme courts.

          They aren’t going to stop because you put your head in the sand.

          • nexusband@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Uh…I never argued against the GOP being fascist, in fact, as a Germany with our history being taught quite well in school (well, at least when I was in school…), I’ve been arguing that the GOP is fascist for years. However, lately “fascist” is thrown around quite fast and loosely. The argument CosmicTurtle made in that context was one of those, IMHO, because it wasn’t an argument about those suckers being openly fascist.

            But I may have just misunderstood.

      • Roger Haase@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        @Maggoty @nullPointer Fear of a 3rd world war plays into the hand of russian propaganda. Russia is geographically the world largest country. Economically they are the size of Italy.
        Is Italy a superpower? No. Neither is Russia.
        And Russia will never start atomic warfare against multiple NATO nuclear powers.

        NATO members just shy away from getting into direct conflict. If they wouldn’t, Russia would be dead.
        Or can you imagine Italy winning a world war?