• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    A base-12 metric system would be absolutely gorgeous. Geometry and trigonometry would be greatly simplified with a duodecimal unit circle. Our 360-degree circle is a truly ugly hack to make geometry play nice with a decimal number system.

    Our base-10 number system would be as ugly to a duodecimal society as a base-7 system would be to us.

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      On the last point, a better comparison would be base 6 or base 14.

      10 = 2 × 5
      6 = 2 × 3
      14 = 2 × 7

      Or maybe a better way of thinking about it is the percentage of numbers that divide nicely in the base, as a percentage.

      Base 10 has 2, 5, 10 = 30%

      So maybe base 3 is the closest, at 33% of numbers being easily divisible.

      Either way, 7 is a significantly worse base than 10.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Base-6 wouldn’t be bad at all. “100” in base 6 is 36 in base 10. Their metricated unit circle would have three times as many “degree” divisions as we have hours on a clock.

        Base 7 or 14 would require something akin to the sexagesimal abstraction layer we use to make base-10 play nice with angles.