More than 15% of teens say they're on YouTube or TikTok ‘almost constantly’
www.cnbc.com
A new Pew Research Center study finds that more than 15% of teens say they're on YouTube or TikTok "almost constantly."

More than 15% of teens say they’re on YouTube or TikTok ‘almost constantly’::A new Pew Research Center study finds that more than 15% of teens say they’re on YouTube or TikTok “almost constantly.”

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    11·
    11 months ago

    Would you say that someones that likes smashing rocks is discriminating against rocks?

    i wouldn’t say they’re are discriminating against rocks. i’d say they are using discrimination and allowing themselves to smash objects they class as “rocks”

    • McKee@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      11 months ago

      But you would agree that the rocks themselves cannot have an issue with it? That’s the gist of the sentientist position. Sentient beings have an interest in living, not being exploited and thus the sentientist position goes further and say that for the same reasons we say that humans have a right to live (i.e.: not being killed) or being exploited, we should extend the same rights to sentient beings because there is no morally relevant difference between us and other sentient beings that would justify killing them when you would not kill a human being in the same position.

      Note that this does not mean all sentient beings should have exactly the same rights. Obviously giving the right to vote to a cow does not make sense, the same way we don’t give the right to abortion to cis men because they cannot make use of this right.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        11·
        11 months ago

        we should extend the same rights to sentient beings because there is no morally relevant difference between us and other sentient beings

        yes there is.

        • McKee@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          11 months ago

          What’s your morally relevant argument for killing for example cows for taste pleasure and not humans then? What’s this special trait humans have that other sentient being do not possess that allows us to do that to them?

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            11·
            11 months ago

            What’s this special trait humans have that other sentient being do not possess that allows us to do that to them?

            they aren’t human.

        • McKee@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          11 months ago

          Ok it feels like you’re just starting to spam answers without even taking the time to argument on why you think something. I try to take the time to justify my position and you just answer with small sentences that don’t do anything for an interesting discussion.

          Let’s stop there, have a nice day.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        11·
        11 months ago

        But you would agree that the rocks themselves cannot have an issue with it?

        yea. it doesn’t change whether you’re practicing discrimination.

        • McKee@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          11 months ago

          Yes I agree in principle that it’s a discrimination. They way I used discrimination was implying that someone on the “bad” side of the discrimination could be discriminated against. My bad I should have clearly defined the way I used this term. Sorry English is not my first language as well.

          In any case a discrimination that does not hurt the discriminated or another sentient being is of no consequence for me.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            12·
            11 months ago

            so you can see, in this case, NDT was right that vegans also practice speciesism, even if his other arguments are kinda stupid.