The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

read more: https://www.semafor.com/article/12/08/2023/un-security-council-votes-on-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-amid-israel-hamas-conflict

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    11 months ago

    15 countries voting, they lost 13-1 (UK abstained), literally only the US voted against the resolution and yet they can veto it.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is clearly US and UK vs Gaza children.

      “Oh hamas did this and that so lets kill them all, stop water food and aid and move 2 million around” is not justified …

      • sadreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This was always the plan.

        People are wising up but I doubt anything can stop it now.

        Cat is out of the bag.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It is clearly US and UK

        The UK abstained, that is explicitly not supporting the US. It’s not objecting either, but it’s not supporting.

        What I find interesting is that the PM Rishi Sunak talks in full support of Israel in national politics, yet on the international stage the stance is now slightly more neutral.

        • Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          It is a scam happened before, countries abstain because they know the US would veto. If UK didn’t abstain I think the resolution would pass. That’s why they did it, help to not let the resolution pass and it doesn’t look bad as veto.

            • sadreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Not to a scam but clever politics… Let US to take the hit, since supporting Israel is becoming hard as people are wising up to their goals and policies vis a vis Palestinians. The people more educated people get on the topic, the harder it is support Israel at all.

              Politicians know that domestic support esp among younger people is down.

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Its a desperate attempt not to piss off even more voters. While still supporting party funders ideals.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Does a “no” vote by the US automatically veto it? Or did they have to take an additional action? If the vote alone didn’t veto it, that’s the perfect place to hedge your bets. Vote no, then don’t veto it. You can claim both sides then to appease everyone.