Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 11 months agosystemd 255 Released With A "Blue Screen of Death" For Linux Systemswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1209arrow-down19cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
arrow-up1200arrow-down1external-linksystemd 255 Released With A "Blue Screen of Death" For Linux Systemswww.phoronix.comChewy@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
minus-squareInfiltrated_ad8271@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down2·11 months ago Hibernation into swap files backed by Btrfs are now supported. So, with btrfs on ssd, is there any use case for a swap partition?
minus-squarefalsem@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·11 months agoUse case is not having enough RAM?
minus-squarebdonvr@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 months agoI think what they mean is that you can just make a swap FILE instead, which you can grow and shrink as needed. No need to mess with partitioning.
minus-squareInfiltrated_ad8271@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoYep. In fact my comment seemed so clear to me that I assumed it was some kind of joke, but looking at the votes, maybe swapfiles aren’t as well known as I thought.
minus-squarerotopenguin@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 months agoDo you mean that you don’t have to find the LBA of the extents of your swap file, and put that into a kernel argument anymore? Cuz that is a nasty, skanky hack.
minus-squareInfiltrated_ad8271@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 months agoI’ve never heard of that, it’s beyond me. So it’s an increased risk when tweaking the kernel? As an average home user it’s all right?
So, with btrfs on ssd, is there any use case for a swap partition?
Use case is not having enough RAM?
I think what they mean is that you can just make a swap FILE instead, which you can grow and shrink as needed. No need to mess with partitioning.
Yep. In fact my comment seemed so clear to me that I assumed it was some kind of joke, but looking at the votes, maybe swapfiles aren’t as well known as I thought.
Do you mean that you don’t have to find the LBA of the extents of your swap file, and put that into a kernel argument anymore?
Cuz that is a nasty, skanky hack.
I’ve never heard of that, it’s beyond me. So it’s an increased risk when tweaking the kernel? As an average home user it’s all right?