• markeydarkey2@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No this is bad, because it’s directly intended to increase consumption of gasoline, which is the opposite of what we should be doing.

    • -seabass@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then do your part by scrapping your gas guzzling audi and start taking the bus.

      • markeydarkey2@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is ad hominem your plan here or do you not understand why it’s bad to increase fossil fuel use when we need to be reducing it ASAP? I don’t drive that much, and I try to drive efficiently when I do. I also advocate for moving away from car centricity because of how wasteful it is. Do you?

        This is literally a supplier wanting to foster demand for their product regardless of the external impact (in this case, additional environmental pollution all for the sake of profit). This is not something to be celebrated.

    • RatioProfessional853@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your country should pay the rest of the world for all the gasoline it consumed before they get to block poor countries who have barely consumed any, and they need it to improve their lives.