• FriendsCallMeAsshole@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Since a sophisticated program in that case would be considerably harder to implement than a machine learning approach (what people generally mean when talking about AI): very likely AI

    • C_Madison@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      “AI is everything a computer is bad at. The moment a computer can do it it’s no longer AI. That way there’s never any progress in AI.” … really old adage in computer science.

    • ashashlondon@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I guess it must be programmed to recognise what a weed looks like to be able to identify it against what isn’t. Is that AI? I have no idea. Seems like everything at the moment is AI.

      • druscarlet@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most likely it is programmed to if the specific crop at all stages of development and eliminate everything else.

      • weaselmaster@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I say NOT AI.

        I mean, pattern matching has been a thing for a long time, and getting more and more sophisticated, but slapping an AI label on a (albeit new and interesting) robot tractor seems unnecessary, and degrades the meaning of the term.

        And don’t get me started on calling their crop ‘5G Onions’!

      • CaptRon25@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Laser weeder’s have been doing this for years. I don’t think AI has anything to do with it other than a marketing buzz words

        • iCan20@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Even pre defined parameters can be identified and set using an AI model. In fact I believe this is more likely than installing the AI model on the weed plucking device.

          So yes AI. No, not an active AI model thinking while weeding.

    • FilteringAccount123@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Guided by a fridge actually… everyone’s been so fixated with AI that we haven’t noticed how much smarter “smart” appliances have gotten.

      My washer just did my taxes!

      • VikKarabin@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Is that a problem in life? Saffron too pricey? :) The whole fun of it is that it’s pricey

        • Murrlll@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If spending money needlessly gives you a thrill would you like my Venmo account name?

        • _RADIANTSUN_@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          More people would have access to more of it if more could be produced. And even at current prices, the producers who currently manually process it generally work thankless, fairly physically taxing and unrewarding jobs. There is clearly not enough value present for it to be produced manually at a fair price.

          This process is obviously begging to be mechanized.

  • shoe_of_bill@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh my god. Just because it’s programmed to search for a certain thing within a certain spec does not mean it’s AI. It’s programmed to do a job and it does it.

  • FriendsCallMeAsshole@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m pretty sure a version of this that just burns the weeds using lasers already exists. Having some contraption to rip out the weeds to me seems a lot more complicated and therefore expensive, with also more moving parts that likely need repair more often. Would ripping out the weeds offer that much more benefit over just burning them to justify that additional cost? I assume ripped out weeds would stay away longer, since the roots are removed or damaged, but I don’t really know the economic impact of weeds on the harvest. Do we have any farmers in the room who could share some insight on this?

    • _RADIANTSUN_@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Actually ripping them out is simpler and more effective. Plants contain quite a lot of water and lasers are really not very efficient and effective in that use case.

  • theboblit@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Like 2 years ago I was telling a guy at work that this was going to be what farming would evolve into. Can’t wait to see more than an expensive weed picker.

    • AlbanySteamedHams@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And it’s going to be hacked and it’s going to make saffron less expensive and therefore less fun, and it’s going to rip your arms out, and it’s not really AI, and it should just use lasers. To list some other complaints I’ve seen on this thread. Fucking Reddit.

  • BrianOconneR34@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    So how much for this or the good ol can of cancer juice weed killer? It would be great to have robots pulling weeds. Anything beats whatever is sprayed on what we eat.

  • che-solo@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Round up lobbyists are running to the capital with bags of cash to stop this AI madness!