Passengers who booked trips have been told refunds will be issued in monthly installments

Life at Sea Cruises’ first three-year sailing was announced in March and promised passengers willing to fork out at least $29,999 per year

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, 2.5k a month is what some people spend on rent+food+utilities. Assuming all food onboard is paid for, it’s sounds like an ok deal for someone who actually wants to temporarily live on a cruise ship and has the income/savings to pay for all of it upfront.

      • Ramόn Sánchez @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree. The only major difference I see, is you most likely have to at least pay for one year up front. I have heard of people doing exactly as you suggested, so it’s not really as crazy of an idea as it may sound.

        If I could afford the upfront cost, I would definitely try it.

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It does kinda sound like a fun way to spend 3 years, but it will probably suck. It’s not going to be a good room. You’re gonna get sick no matter what you do. And unless you actually have money leftover, you’re not going to be doing much in the ports. Also, you’ve got no storage for 3 years of souvenirs.

          Oh and if you miss the boat, you’d have to fly to the next port to get back on.