E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

  • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It it really, though? If you consistently disprove someone’s claims using factual information and they choose to dismiss it, then they’re just willfully ignorant.

    Stupidity can be corrected. Intentional stupidity is inexcusable

    • centof@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most people have a hard time accepting criticism. They interpret any perceived attack on their beliefs as an attack on them (their ego). Once their on the defensive, you have a tiny chance of convincing them. Instead, they might justify their position and/or simply attack or dismiss your argument at best. But if their not feeling nice, it’s more likely they resort to namecalling such as sheep / lib / commie / dumbass etc.

    • wantd2B1ofthestrokes@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Disagree. They just believe what they believe for “non-rational” reasons. Often social or emotional reasons that they aren’t explicitly aware of. We all do this.

      It doesn’t make them incapable of reason.

      Fundamentally I don’t believe that a large proportion of humanity is “stupid.” I think that’s pretty narcissistic.

      And this attitude often seeps into the continuously fact quoting method. Which basically makes the whole thing a non starter