crackwhat@alien.topB to Data Hoarder@selfhosted.forumEnglish · 1 year agoDeath of a drivealien.topimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageDeath of a drivealien.topcrackwhat@alien.topB to Data Hoarder@selfhosted.forumEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecrackwhat@alien.topOPBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYup, never really had an issue (touch wood) with any of the other sizes and I had 4 of this exact model get a bunch of defects. Would def avoid the ST12000NM models if possible!
minus-squareHTWingNut@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoRead error rates are meaningless on Seagate drives. It’s tallying internal data and not indicative of drive health.
minus-squarecrackwhat@alien.topOPBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOn a SAS disk, grown defects are reassigned blocks, not read and seek error rates.
minus-squareHTWingNut@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSorry, I just read “disk read errors” from previous poster and see a lot of people freak out over the seek error rate or disk read error attributes.
Yup, never really had an issue (touch wood) with any of the other sizes and I had 4 of this exact model get a bunch of defects.
Would def avoid the ST12000NM models if possible!
Read error rates are meaningless on Seagate drives. It’s tallying internal data and not indicative of drive health.
On a SAS disk, grown defects are reassigned blocks, not read and seek error rates.
Sorry, I just read “disk read errors” from previous poster and see a lot of people freak out over the seek error rate or disk read error attributes.