• retiredminion@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      An informative link, thank you.

      Solidarity action (also known as secondary action, a secondary boycott, a solidarity strike, or a sympathy strike) is industrial action by a trade union in support of a strike initiated by workers in a separate corporation, but often the same enterprise, group of companies, or connected firm.

      In Australia,Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, the United States, and the United Kingdom, solidarity action is theoretically illegal, and strikes can only be against the contractual employer.

      The term “secondary action” is often used with the intention of distinguishing different types of trade dispute with a worker’s direct contractual employer. Thus, a secondary action is a dispute with the employer’s parent company, its suppliers, financiers, contracting parties, or any other employer in another industry.

      A postal strike doesn’t seem to meet any of this criteria.

      In the United Kingdom, sympathy strikes were outlawed … repealed … outlawed … The laws outlawing solidarity strikes remain to this day.

      • AFatDarthVader@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a Wikipedia article about the general concept of solidarity action. The postal strike is “industrial action by a trade union in support of a strike initiated by workers in a separate corporation”.

        • retiredminion@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, but it was a link you provided?

          In any case, this discussion has taught me that Sweden is very different in ways I’d never realized. I appreciate the education and will view Sweden related news in a different light from now on.

            • retiredminion@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s very clear that our cultural differences will have us continuing to talk past each other. You see this as free market, I see it as mob action against free market.

              • Ok_Individual_5579@alien.topB
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Then you’ll be wrong per defintion…

                Your free market needs government protection, then its not a free market…

                Its not that we have different opinions, which we have. Its that you dont underdtand what a free market is. In a true free market the negotiation of the work market happens between the employer and the worker, which is the case for sweden and not for the US (i assume you’re american).

                Its not a free market if the governemt deals with the employer in the place of the worker…

                And with a real free market strikes/boycotts are a tool that workers can use.

                • retiredminion@alien.topB
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I have no doubt that is your belief.

                  I see “rule of law” as the guiding structure over mob action. If there is no baseline of law then whoever gathers the largest mob runs over everyone else, as seems to be the case in Sweden.

                  “Free Market” is a term that generally refers to the economics of cost and trade, not to mob extortion and enforced conformity.

                  It’s ironic that you refer to the negotiation between employer and worker when that is precisely what is not happening in Sweden.