Wondering what people’s suggestions would be should I get the current gen i7 or last gen i9?

Primarly use my pc for gaming a bit of video editing + work but when I upgrade my pc again in hopefully 5+ years I put the CPU, motherboard and memory into my home server that I use for my lab.

i9 is £460 i7 is £420

  • charonme@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    with such a low price difference I’d be seriously considering it and comparing them more thoroughly, however where I live the 13900K is still about 50% more expensive than the 14700K and just a couple of EUR cheaper than the 14900K

  • madscribbler@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re going to get a 13900k, get a 14900k, They are only $50 more. Just make sure you get a z790 mainboard.

  • No_Dig_7017@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a 13900k and there really few and far between workloads that can use the sustained all 40 threads to its maximum. I do high performance computing and encoding besides gaming. I get 100% usage with some very specific R code, Python only goes above 1 core for very short durations and handbrake uses ~60% of the cpu for software x265. Also you’ll need faster ram to get the most of it and cooling it is a harder as well. I’d go with the 14700k, save the difference and place it towards the gpu

  • Grim_Rite@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I’m gonna keep the same pc for 5 years, I’d go for 14700k or 14900k instead and a z790 refresh motherboard. I want a board with wifi 7 10gb lan port and gen 5 ssd (this one not sure as it cuts the bandwidth for gpus)

    Other option is amd 7950x3d or 7900x with x670 motherboard

  • No_Shoe954@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You really can’t go wrong with either one, just undervolt, and it will cut down on power usage without sacrificing performance.

    • looncraz@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That probably would be the wiser choice when compared to buying into an EOL platform… though I would suggest the 7800X3D.

  • randysailer@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would go the 13900k seems they have better memory controlers so far so you could go with 7200mhz memory and not have to worry about XMP working.

    • Geekfest@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just did this last weekend and it’s great! I upgraded a 3770 so it’s a pretty big update for me. :D

    • realrock880@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      igors lab test were flawed. complete misinfo debunked by frame chaser. 14700k running 7466mts here. 14th gen has a better imc

  • Octan3@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Longer term the 13900k will be better. the 14th gen is a joke for the most part in that its basically the same cpu’s with a higher base clock.

  • JonWood007@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just throwing this out there but is a 14700k worth an extra $100 over a 12900k? Going by microcenter deals btw.

    • kyralfie@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, it definitely does. There’s a big difference in cache between those and there are some other core enhancements. So 14700K being has essentially faster cores and 8+8 vs 8+12 don’t tell you the whole story.

      People would choose 13600K over 12900K even if the i9 is cheaper than the i5 due do that.

      • jrherita@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really - they’ll throttle if they run too hot. No need to artificially power limit. They’re engineered that way.

        There are also plenty of air coolers than can handle 200-250W