• Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know why this is news. Most consumer Android phones, Google’s included, require you to acknowledge a warning before the ability to sideload is enabled. Their stance has always been “at your own risk, we don’t recommend it” and we always just laugh and say “okay, whatever dude” before we do it anyways.

    • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      we always just laugh and say “okay, whatever dude” before we do it anyways.

      The thing is for people who aren’t used to modding and you try to side-load a random cool app on their phone (or somehow they end up doing it themselves) they might be frightened and may even cancel the installation.

      • infeeeee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But there are also users who interpret dialogs like that the old way:

  • Batman@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can someone please tell Pichai that I can do whatever I want with my phone that I paid for. (Also tell him to fuck off and that he can suck ma balls)

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Be Pichai.

    Tell people not to sideload apps fOr SaFeTy.

    Find out [Insert Malware App] has been on the play store for months and tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of people have downloaded it.

  • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Could you imagine Laptop manufacturers saying “do NOT download apps from other websites. ONLY download from the Windows App Store”

    Like, fuck off Pichai, you’re insane

    Are phones the only devices out there that receive such scrutiny in the tech world?? My laptop can literally do the exact same thing but better

    • rob299@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s different then the owner off the defualt android appstore telling you. If a device manufactuer did say this, i’d question why.

      Did google pay them to?? or more specific to your comment did microsoft pay them

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      People should do that though

      It’s good security practice to use your package manager and if you have to download off the internet then you should build it yourself

      • rob299@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I will with you halfway through with this, here is how I view it.

        If you have little experience with telling between safe sources and sketchy, then yes, stick with the defualt.

        If ypuu know about some safe appstores or repositories then that’s when you could say you are qualified to make thes decisions. Like I know Fdroid is safer and better than the defialt on everyway for the users best interest, but if you dont know your sources then you should not sidelode untill you do know how to make good decisions.

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really planning on sacrificing privacy and safety from monopolies by doing that thanks. Not everybody’s threat model is that ridiculous.

    • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What he really means is “we want to take your freedom away and lock you into our proprietary ecosystem so we can mine all of your data and extract as much profit from you as possible”

      That’s why you should use GrapheneOS

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ll keep sideloading if they don’t allow F-Droid, NewPipe and LibreTube on the Play Store.

  • LCP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I own my device. I get to choose what I install on it.

    Google Chrome isn’t on the Microsoft Store on Windows or macOS Store on macOS. Should I stop “sideloading” it according to his advice?

    Edit: Found more about the quote on The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/14/23960811/pichai-we-dont-want-to-allow-you-to-completely-compromise-your-phone

    “We’re trying to strike a balance. Apple’s iPhone only allows the App Store, but we believe in choice, so on Android we allow you to sideload and install additional applications.”

    I’m so conflicted about it. I don’t want people to have to suffer for intentionally or unintentionally installing garbage on their phones, but I can’t let that take away from how I use my device as well.

    • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google Chrome isn’t on the Microsoft Store on Windows or macOS Store on macOS. Should I stop “sideloading” it according to his advice?

      Yes, actually no one on this planet should be using Chrome or any proprietary browser when superior FLOSS alternatives like Firefox and LibreWolf exist.

  • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google CEO Pichai can go fuck himself.

    Fuck you Pichai, fuck you Google, fuck you Big Tech. I’m not doing what you are telling me, I’m not using your crappy proprietary services that are built to spy on everyone, I’m not watching your shitty advertisements, I’m definitely not giving you any of my data. I hope your piece of shit company goes bankrupt and you end up on the street, that’s where you belong to. I’m not a slave of your totalitarian system, I’m free to choose where I download my software and what software I want to run on my devices. I do everything to avoid your surveillance capitalism, I use FLOSS software wherever I can. Your business model is a piece of trash, it will inevitably fail at some point. I am sure that you will try to do everything to mislead the public and to get them to believe your lies, but not everyone is as stupid as you would like them to be.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Clearly this is BS. Sideloading is perfectly safe if you just reputable resources.

    What he’s really saying if that the average user is too dumb and will install any rubbish from anywhere. He’s not wrong but that shouldn’t prevent competent users from sideloading.

    At least they’ve made the process scary enough that the average user don’t even bother to do it

    It’s a non issue that shouldn’t be given any time.

    I’ve sideloaded for years and never had any malware.

    • rob299@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He doesnt want to name specific types of people or it might make it seem like google attacking specific people. So instead all users get bundled in this. They will use the most careless users as a reason to take it away from all users. It benefits them.

      I think that Google really just wants to get less and less people to sideload and then shame others that do through public shaming. ‘oh that’s dangersous son; you shouldn’t be sideloading that Fdroid app! Google said so.’ That’s why they brought it up to begin with, this is as google goes over court with epic games over the app store fee.