I’m having trouble wrapping my head around the scale of the problem of nuclear waste. If we took all the nuclear waste produced in a year and evenly blended it into all gasoline burned in a year would the radiation be deadly? Dangerous? Detectable?

It’s easiest to get numbers for the US.

2 000 000 kg of waste per year

510 000 000 000 Liters of gasoline

Obviously this isn’t a real proposal, although I think it would reduce carbon emissions…

  • m0darn@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is your proposal basically to burn away nuclear waste?

    No. It’s to disperse it.

    The main problem is the safety and handling of such radioactive waste.

    It was very much not meant as a serious proposal.

    How would this reduce carbon emissions?

    Do you want such a substance sitting in your vehicle, garage, gas station with high traffic, etc

    • habanhero@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. It’s to disperse it.

      It was very much not meant as a serious proposal.

      Okay good. The joke was lost on me, I thought this was a serious post. Didn’t expect it in AskScience.

      • m0darn@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well it’s serious in that I would like to know how radioactive 2 million kilograms of nuclear waste mixed into 500 billion liters of gasoline would be.

        I guess it’s 4 milligrams per liter. So a grain of sand per liter. My car is in the garage with a 40 liter gas tank. So 40 gains of sand worth of nuclear waste. How dangerous is that? Is it like evacuate the neighborhood, or is it don’t plan any long road trips.

        • habanhero@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure why you think dispersing nuclear waste into our environment instead of isolating it is a good idea.

          If it’s just a thought experiment from a mathematical / chemical perspective, maybe someone else would like to take on the question and do the math.

          From a sociological and logistical perspective, it’s just not gonna happen. Pretty sure people’s tolerance for radioactive materials anywhere near them is zero. There isn’t any amount of radioactivity / danger that is considered socially acceptable.