• LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Blah blah blah, I know anyone who makes more than 150k a year bougie and stealing from the poor. You ain’t going to make headway there with me

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the amount of money it’s the method of acquisition. An engineer or independent contractor or something could make that kind of money and still not be considered bourgeoisie. (Though probably petit-bourgeoisie?)

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        (Though probably petit-bourgeoisie?)

        Still a prole until you stop relying on selling your labour power for money. Though an outlier statistically.

          • Urist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It did make me think of examples where there are edge cases though. Say a freelancer or an artist that, although they do not directly employ people, their income from their work could be greatly multiplied by the work done by others. In the end it might just boil down to details whether such an arrangement is or is not petit bourgeoisie.