• AMillionNames@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Science fiction always challenges my suspension of disbelief is when people land on planets to skirmish with conventional weapons instead of, say, throw a big heavy aerodynamic solid rock from space.

    • Evilsmiley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can make good reasons or at least plausible ones. 40k has planetary shields. There could be a civil war so neither side might want to destroy the surfaces of each planet and civilians. Battletech has spaceship tech being rare and irreplacable, and there are treaties limiting orbital and nuclear bombardment.

      Sometimes the most realistic route just isnt fun though so i can usually look past the contrivances.

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Good sci-fi usually treats this on par with using nuclear weapons (which it kinda is?). In Babylon 5, mass drivers are banned by intergalactic treaty, and when one race uses them anyway it literally bombs their victims back into the stone age, and it’s treated as a horrifying event --one of the character’s defining moments in the show is just him looking on silently in horror.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Kinetic drives are mass drivers. Unless you use some kind of teleportation or space warping for travel, every ship is a weapon of mass destruction. Every old boat is a surprise WMD, every craft a viable nuke with zero preparation.