His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I could see myself not wanting to dispense the drugs for an execution. (I know they’re not going through the pharmacy, but let’s pretend they did.)

    Is your entire argument based on something that doesn’t happen and will never happen?

    • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hypotheticals are quite a useful thing when exploring ideas. And yes, I’m quite satisfied with how I approached it since I tried to contribute in a positive way rather than just go around and write shit comments that don’t benefit anyone.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but your example is too extreme to take seriously.

        Death like that is so much worse than anything else, that it imo makes any other discussion meaningless. But when your scenario would never ever happen, it’s just a useless comment.

        It doesn’t strengthen any point.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe, but the problem here is that it’s so extreme that it makes no sense.

            Bringing up abortion pills would makeore sense, since someone could conceivably consider that to be murder and refuse to sell it. That would obviously be very stupid but it’s something that actually could happen.

            • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yea, that’s a good example indeed. I did think of it because for me there is no moral contention there.