• PizzaMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, I still hold the position that the right wing is using CRT as a boogeyman, and an unconfirmed manifesto (that doesn’t even having anything to do with CRT, let alone being littered with it) in no way supports your claim.

      • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it’s almost like I don’t want to lend any credence to terrorists/terrorist orgs.

          • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If your water stops working in your bathroom, but you still have water pressure in other parts of the house. Without looking in the pipes, is it wrong to say that there is a clog?

            Even though you never looked?

            I never claimed to know what’s in Hale’s manifesto if there actually is one, and I don’t need to because I know what leads to a metaphorical clog, and CRT ain’t it.

            • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              The only way to know if water stopped working in your bathroom is to observe it you have to look. Further bathrooms have shutoffs, it’s far more likely the shutoff was enabled. Water pipes getting clogged in a specific area is very uncommon so it would be wrong to think your pipes are clogged. It looks like you know as much about plumbing as the manifesto.

              • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s a metaphor. If you can’t even try to understand what I’m saying then I don’t know what to tell you.

                • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s a terrible metaphor. Claiming knowledge about something without ever seeing it is impossible.

                  • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Claiming knowledge about something without ever seeing it is impossible.

                    Humans can’t see X rays. Yet we claim immense knowledge of them.

        • Throwaway@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’ve said over and over that you want to better understand conservatives, then you say stuff like this. You also whine that you can’t just defeat the point of the sub by posting lefty shit.

          Do you honestly want to understand, or is that just an excuse?

          • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’ve said over and over that you want to better understand conservatives

            No I haven’t. I understand conservatism plenty. It’s all about fighting literally anything that would make the world better, more empathetic, more prosperous, more fair, and actively pushing for regression and death of humanity.

            I’m not here to understand conservatism better. I’m here to stay in the loop, keep my debate skills in check, a bit of entertainment, and on the off chance a fence sitter is passing by, hopefully enough context for them to see through conservative bullshit.