A second teacher at a high school in Missouri was put on leave after administrators discovered her OnlyFans side hustle.
Megan Gaither, 31, said during an interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that she was placed on leave from her English teaching and varsity cheerleading coach position on Oct. 27 after district officials found out about her account on the OnlyFans platform.
Nobody’s biz what she does outside of work. These cunts can fuck off.
This is the logic I use to defend Jonathan Majors
Who the fuck did this chick assault, numbnuts?
Removed by mod
You’re doing a huge smooth brained move by making a false equivalence of “questionable moral choices” between rape and getting naked
The fact that you can’t see how these two things are so very far apart shows enough of who you really are.
Removed by mod
I’m sorry, did you say cervix?
You either need to go back to school or you have some weird-ass fetish for endoscopy
Removed by mod
I don’t expect logic or rationality from the crowd you’re replying to.
I expect double standards, moving goalposts, and plain ol’ cognitive dissonance.
lol, you asshats deserve each other.
It’s a one week old account talking to a 3-day-old account. I’ve got a feeling there’s no good faith arguments to be had here.
ding ding
Calm down.
Oh sweetheart I’m not using logic or rationality, Im responding to absurdity with absurdity.
Yet in one of these situations no one was harmed and in another a lot of harm was done to other people.
Removed by mod
In this case I think it is.
It’s not that she’s a sex worker that’s the issue it’s the fact that teens can barely keep their head clear is they have a cute teacher they could picture naked. That effect would be 1000% worse if you can simply give your teacher five bucks to slap her kitty while saying your a great student.
This is like blaming the victim for being shot. It’s a 100% the guy with the gun
It’s not at all the same.
In this case she would be the victim and the shooter. She shot herself in the foot, there are hundreds of ways to spoliate identity effectively on onlyfans and she chose not to. She knew her fan ase and took advantage then claimed to be the victim.
If it weren’t a teacher pandering customized pornography to underage school children would it be ok? I’m gunna guess no, it’s essentially pedophilia at distance.
Removed by mod
That’s not an argument, that’s an attempt to sound intelligent without actually making a point of saying anything intelligent.
Removed by mod
Yep, much like that.
Thanks for understanding
They could just as easily AI her face onto some chick banging 16 dudes.
Correct. I’m not saying I agree with it but I am saying I understand the reasoning.
That’s not how public school teachers operate.
For example, you’re not allowed to be visibly drunk in public if you are a public school teacher.
There are good reasons for this. Teachers are supposed to be role models for students, so seeing one passed out in the gutter isn’t acceptable.
If you don’t like it, then don’t become a public school teacher. There are plenty of other jobs you can do.
Like be a police officer, because we apparently don’t give a fuck if they drive drunk.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2022/01/20/hennepin-county-sheriff-hit-126-mph-drunk-before-rollover-crash
Eh, Hutch got demoted to transit cop and then quickly got fired from that too, partly due to the drunk driving thing, and good riddance.
Also there was a Minneapolis cop who got busted for having an OnlyFans last month and she still might get fired for it. A cop having an OF isn’t one of my many complaints about my local police department.
Not sure how this is relevant.
The job qualifications and contracts are different for police officers than teachers.
It’s entirely relevant to your argument. Both are commonly expected to be role models. This expectation is enforced in only one case.
If officers agreed to terms that prevented them from having an OnlyFans, then you would have a point.
It’s not a part of their contract, so why would they be punished for it?
It is a part of a public school teacher’s contract, so they aren’t allowed to do it.
If they don’t like it, they can do something else.
If extra restrictions are being placed on their personal lives they should be paid more to compensate for it.
Public Schools: “The best we can offer is a ‘Great Teacher’ mug, tissues for your classroom, and a hearty thumbs up! Actually, the budget won’t support the mug. Or that tissues. Oh, and in completely unrelated news, the superintendent was just given a 25% raise.”
Lol, around easter our admins gathered together to go door to door and deliver plastic easter eggs, one per teacher, with about 5 loose jelly beans inside. Not even good jelly beans.
Like, they’re paid twice what we are and they spent a whole day on this.
What do you mean? It’s a part of their contract. They can take it or leave it.
And it looks like they’re leaving it. Not great when there’s a teacher shortage.
Citation?
Prove it.
Saw at least one of my teachers drunk in public basically every night (local bar and grill).
deleted by creator
Just because teachers are controlled by schools in other ways doesn’t mean that they should be controlled in this way also. Simply saying that teachers can’t do X and therefore they ought not be able to do Y is a non-argument.
deleted by creator
People don’t want to acknowledge facts they don’t like.