Dust0741@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoShare your coveryourtracks score!coveryourtracks.eff.orgexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mllinux_lugcast@lemux.minnix.devtheandrocollection@lemm.ee
arrow-up191arrow-down1external-linkShare your coveryourtracks score!coveryourtracks.eff.orgDust0741@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square60fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mllinux_lugcast@lemux.minnix.devtheandrocollection@lemm.ee
What score does your browser(s) get? I’ll start: I got: one in ~25000 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours
minus-squareDreadPotato@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-21 year ago“Your browser has a unique fingerprint”…well that isn’t good…
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoUnique among the people who use that website. So if nobody else if you’re configuration ever tried that website… You would be unique The bits of entropy are the more important parts of the results. The lower the bits the better
minus-squareDevjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoPlease also consider things like canvas spoofing. It will create a unique fingerprint that is different every time.
“Your browser has a unique fingerprint”…well that isn’t good…
Unique among the people who use that website. So if nobody else if you’re configuration ever tried that website… You would be unique
The bits of entropy are the more important parts of the results. The lower the bits the better
Please also consider things like canvas spoofing. It will create a unique fingerprint that is different every time.