Sinthoras39@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoArch Linux vs. Manjaro Linuxmessage-squaremessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up112arrow-down1message-squareArch Linux vs. Manjaro LinuxSinthoras39@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKindaABigDyl@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoArch does not have a place though. It’s just a more buggy Arch with a worse maintaining team EDIT: Actually, tbh it’s incorrect to even call Manjaro Arch. That’s an insult to Arch
minus-squareentropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year ago Arch … [is] just a more buggy Arch I know you meant to say Manjaro, but that’s a pretty funny take.
minus-squareShareni@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoDon’t forget that it’s repo has less packages and that they’re delayed by two weeks for absolutely no reason. Not only opening users to potential hacks, but also messing up AUR package installation. Manjaro is Arch’s glue eating cousin
Arch does not have a place though. It’s just a more buggy Arch with a worse maintaining team
EDIT: Actually, tbh it’s incorrect to even call Manjaro Arch. That’s an insult to Arch
I know you meant to say Manjaro, but that’s a pretty funny take.
Oops lol
Leaving in
Don’t forget that it’s repo has less packages and that they’re delayed by two weeks for absolutely no reason. Not only opening users to potential hacks, but also messing up AUR package installation.
Manjaro is Arch’s glue eating cousin