Nadella, Gates, and Ballmer have all admitted to Microsoft’s mobile mistakes.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Windows Phone failed because there were no apps for it. There was no YouTube app, no Facebook app, no Twitter app, etc until very late or never at all. They should have just paid developers to make the apps so that people would buy the phones. The OS was great and worked on a wide range of hardware. It could have been a great enterprise solution and they seemed to be heading that direction but the lack of third party made it little more than A Microsoft feature phone.

    • Brkdncr@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They literally couldn’t pay the devs. Netflix for instance flat out refused to have blackberry pay for 2 full time devs to maintain an app.

      Netflix looked at the market share and determined that there was 0 benefit. The people that were on blackberry devices already had a Netflix account.

      Additionally Blackberry store apps were compelling for devs. Dev feedback included ease of development and more importantly they made a lot more money on the blackberry store than on iOS/android, both because the cut was better and they could jack the prices up because the customers were not nearly as frugal.

      To get into mobile would require a massive overhaul of windows apps to get them mobile-friendly

      Oh look, that’s exactly what they did and now we have PWAs for lots of apps. Maybe MS is getting ready to take a stab at mobile again.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        Netflix have a different relationship with Microsoft than they did with Blackberry, MS would have had much more clout.

    • teamonkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      They couldn’t even be bothered developing their own apps for it. The mail app began to lag behind Outlook on Android, Minecraft was never ported to it when it could have been a killer exclusive app.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Google was often guilty of that too. I remember a number of Android apps that were pretty far behind the iOS ones. I don’t think that is the case anymore though.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There were also a bunch of iOS apps behind Android ones. Remember when iOS finally got widgets? Different companies focused on different functionality first. But at this point, android and iOS have had the time to play catch-up with each other.

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Difference being that Apple does not make Android apps. Google’s own apps on iOS were behind their own on Android. I recall the YouTube and Maps app missing some features for quite a while on Android that were on IOS. I get that companies silo teams from each other but it’s a little embarrassing when you’re software on your platform is behind your software on your competitor’s platform.

            OS-wise, yeah it has largely been Apple playing catch up with iOS aside from messaging.

      • Matty_r@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        That reminded me when the Remote Desktop app turned up on Android before the Windows Phone. Ludicrous.

    • DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This was the downfall of BlackBerry as well.

      QNX-based BB10 OS was phenomenal, and their hardware was top notch.

      It was the lacking app ecosystem that killed it.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I was a BB developer right around the time of their demise. It never mattered how good or bad their OS was, because the development environment for BB was complete shit - which was a big part of why nobody wrote apps for it.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      They should have just paid developers to make the apps so that people would buy the phones.

      Blackberry at their end (circa 2011 or so) started handing out $10,000 grants to developers to make apps for them. I thought about applying for one, but $10K is not much at all to develop a decently-featured app that does anything, and BB’s development environment was such an unbelievable clusterfuck that really no amount of money could have made worthwhile to endure.

      Also: 16-bit color lol.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          5 bits each for red and blue and 6 for green. Who needs more than that?

          The only reason I liked it at all was that I created a lot of owner-drawn controls (since the built-in Blackberry “fields” were shit) that used a lot of bitmap memory for animation, and reducing your memory footprint by a factor of two (compared to 32-bit graphics) wasn’t worthless, especially for the older devices.

    • eek2121@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is because every single mobile version of Windows was incompatible (After version 6) with the previous. They kept reinventing the wheel over and over again.

    • _pete_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They totally did that

      The problem was that people weren’t really interested in any of it.

      The UI was cluttered and messy to look at, none of it was as polished or natural to use as iOS or Android.

      Plus there was no Google Maps, no Google Docs (and Office 365 wasn’t around to replace it), even that apps that were in the store felt pretty bad quality. I had Spotify on my iPhone and it was nearly flawless, when I switched to Windows Phone it kept cutting out or crashing or disconnecting from the mobile connection, it just wasn’t fully baked.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yep, if you don’t even have the stuff the first iPhone came with, your platform isn’t going to make it.

      • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        The first iPhone didn’t come with those things. There wasn’t even an App Store until a year and a half after it came out. The first gen was pretty much crap. It didn’t have 3g when other phones of the time did. It had the best browser but it was slow as shit. The whole page would turn gray when you scrolled around. There was no copy/paste. You couldn’t sync with Exchange. It was missing basic features that other phones of the time had. It was probably the 3GS or the 4 when it got really good.

          • pycorax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            WP had a far superior 3rd party YouTube app than any other platform’s first party app at the time. The only reason why they didn’t have a first party was because Google was intentionally throwing road blocks to prevent it from happening.