Europe gives Elon Musk 24 hours to respond about Israel-Hamas war misinformation and violence on X::Thierry Breton, the European commissioner for the internal market, warns Elon Musk about disinformation on X related to the Israel-Hamas conflict.

  • DuncanIdaho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nevermind fining Twitter. Elon will see it as a badge of honour and Trumpspin.

    What the EU needs to do is block access to the website outright across its member states.

      • DuncanIdaho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Twitter is not the internet, its now a misinformation site that financially rewards that misinformation. The slow death of twitter prompted the birth of threads, bluesky and mastodon to name 3. One goes, three rise. And nobody is being censored - thats the point. What this would be is the consequence of their misuse of free speech.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Twitter is not the internet, its now a misinformation site that financially rewards that misinformation.

          There are an awful lot of users who disagree with that and use it daily. I’m on there on and off all day to interact with my industry and the only misinformation I see is ads for games that have fake gameplay.

          This is just more of the same “Elon bad” crap over and over. Seriously, you’re encouraging the EU to censor the internet like China does because space man is bad.

          • Snekeyes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah. Exactly. Space man is bad. It’s not free speech to harm others. We are in the US where woman don’t have rights over their choices in many states.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What is this “free speech to harm others” narrative? Can you explain the logic on that one?

      • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We tried not censoring the internet and it hasn’t worked

        If it makes you feel better, think of it as Europe defederating from Twitter

        • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whoever chooses which sites get banned from the internet has a whole load of power. They could feasibly, in time, become corrupt and end up banning threats to corporate monopolies, like the Fediverse.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They will become corrupt over time. Power and money yield corruption. Always.

            • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly. So I wouldn’t trust anyone with the power to dictate which websites you can visit and which you can’t

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ya and ban all forms of protest against apartheid.

        That’s the EU and it would be the US too if we didn’t have the first amendment