Major airline faces backlash after using ‘ghost flights’ to exploit a legal loophole: ‘They weren’t even selling tickets’::Ultimately, it’s incumbent on lawmakers to take steps to ensure this practice is discouraged.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t you worry, I’m sure the free market competition will sort it out any minute now…

      /s

      • realharo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But wouldn’t a more free market in this case let them do more direct flights to Melbourne without requiring the extra leg?

        The extra leg is only added to get around a specific kind of regulation of the market (limiting how many flights they can do with Melbourne as a destination), it wouldn’t exist otherwise.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          If Melbourne had unlimited capacity for flights, yes. But that’s where the free market stuff tends to fail in reality, it works if you assume a market without natural limits, but not otherwise.

          • realharo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            But a free market solution would be the airport increasing its prices until the demand at those prices matches how much capacity they have (and probably a push to add more capacity, or a build a new airport nearby, etc.)

            The problem from Australia’s point of view is probably that this could cause their own airlines to be out-competed by foreign ones, or it could reduce the number of destinations where flights are viable, etc.