• Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    And another with hydropower removed. Dams weren’t exactly built with green energy as a goal.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why does it matter why they were built? Low carbon energy is low carbon energy, while some countries may have an natural advantage it typically tends to be in places with lower options for solar.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dams are hugely problematic in their own way. Dam removal is a real thing. We may want fewer dams in the future.

        • Sonori@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Perhaps, but definitely something to worry about after net zero. Dams, especially existing ones, tend to cause local damage to a handful of species, while the natural gas they take off the grid damages nearly all of the ecosystems on the planet while killing people even in normal operation.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a strong argument in favor of nuclear power. You get power like a dam, but without the impact on local ecosystems.