• rutenl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you can’t outright solve a problem you shouldn’t try to improve the situation >:(

    • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is this improving the situation. Do people only throw away the caps? I think this is just some stupid law so that they can say they tried. I still think soda cans are just a better solution and make it mandatory that companies recycle their own waste.

      • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I still think soda cans are just a better solution

        That actually sounds like a good idea to me, or you could make them similar in design to those water-bottles that have the cap meant to stay with the bottle, shown in:

        this image (branding removed)

        Whereas the existing design is similar to the old pull tabs that were on cans which caused ecological damage when people discarded them on the ground.

        I wish they’d instead go after the big companies doing the majority of the damage, but I suppose this’s where the cards lay. (For now)

        • Littleborat@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sucks so much to not be able to throw cans into recycling and be done with it.

          Every week or so I carry some stinky bag of beer cans to these machines and I hate it.

          Other countries should not be forced to implement this.

            • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah I thought only paper products needed an inner coating like that. Is there a concern of it oxidizing or something?

              • Schmeckinger@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Aluminum is poisonous in larger amounts and a lot of can contents are pretty acidic. You could probably line them with non reactive metals like gold, but thst would be very expensive in comparison.

          • MJBrune@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Glass because the added weight ends up being less eco-friendly than plastics during transport. So it’s better to only get glass from local distributers. Also the recycling process of glass is fairly eco unfriendly too.

            Aluminum cans might be the best we have for now. I have seen paper milk carton style containers come up more often. As well as plant based plastics.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What? Don’t be ridiculous. Of course you should still try to improve the situation. That’s like saying trucks that get 7MPG are bad for the environment but don’t bother making trucks that get 20MPG because it still runs on fossil fuels.