Authors using a new tool to search a list of 183,000 books used to train AI are furious to find their works on the list.

  • Shurimal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    just reinforcement learning models

    …like the naturally occuring neural networks are.

    • Khalic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The brain does not work the way you think… (I work in the field, bio-informatics). What you call “neural networks” come from an early misunderstanding of how the brain stores information. It’s a LOT more complicated and frankly, barely understood.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a LOT more complicated and frankly, barely understood.

        Yet you confidently state that the brain doesn’t work the way LLMs do?

        Obviously it doesn’t work exactly the same way that LLMs do, if only because of the completely different substrates. But when you get to more nebulous concepts like “creativity” and “inspiration” it’s not so clear.

        • lloram239@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The part where brain and neural net differ is in the learning via backpropagation, that seem to be done different in the brain, as there is no mechanism to go backwards through the network and jiggle the weights.

          That aside, they seem to work very similar once they are trained, as the knowledge they are able to extract from data ends up being basically the same that a human would be able to extract. There is surprisingly little weirdness in AI and a surprising amount of human-like capabilities.