The EU says X is the worst platform for disinformation | Just as it removes a way to report election misinformation::undefined
The election misinformation seems to be the point. Why else would someone bankroll Twitter/X?
This has been my thought the whole time. In general, just to put down the effective communication of the masses in real time, that is scary to a certain small group of people.
If it’s the worst for disinformation then it’s the best for information, right? Right?
EU should block X. See how Lonnie responds to that.
Future headline: Lonboy threatens to sue EU
Twitter*
I refuse to let companies take ownership of letters. They already have everything else.
I simply call it Ex-Twitter - acknowledging the name change, but not simply adopting it
Twix
Twatter
I know it doesn’t have anything to do with the letter X, I just think it fits now more than ever.
Twitter - between twat and shitter
deleted by creator
We should all keep calling it Twitter and let Elon get pissed at getting dead-named.
Who, Lonnie? That’s what I call him.
“Remember, Free Speech is when I, and only I, can say whatever the hell I want!” - Elon Musk
How is twitter still standing? Mastodon is the way of the future
I sometimes wonder how much it would take to get people to leave X en masse. Maybe if Elon was posting Nazi propaganda?
Nope. I sent this article to my trumper friend and he said “yeah the eu is a horribly corrupt organization”. If Elon promoted Nazi propaganda they would be excited and embrace that too.
Maybe if something else big came along and everyone was like “you’re still using Xitter? Lol okay boomer” they might consider moving over. Maybe.
to be fair I don’t think that there is anyone who wants these kind of people to move to mastodon
I dunno, the only people applauding nazis lately seem to be the canadian parliament
The entire division was cleared by the Canadian government in the 80s
Oh, thank you canada for pardoning nazis, then?
Not even. Remember he was funding people like Andrew Tate thousands of dollars. Nothing is gonna get these people out unless they get charged to use twitter
A lot of people don’t think Andrew Tate is wrong so I don’t think that’s a great argument (or at least that’s what appears to be on places like insta, etc)
Lots of them surely will migrate to Mastodon when Elon releases that fee bs. Honestly, we should thank Elon for that. Thanks to him, Mastodon will become mainstream soon.
If lemmy didn’t take over the world after the Reddit schism then I don’t think twitter will ever die either. Twitter users have been given every reason to leave yet there’s already lots of people paying money to the person they hate the most in the world just to use it. And most of those people aren’t really people anymore, they’re twitter users on every level of their being. It would be like a blobfish out of water.
I’m sure that’s only for blue checks.
Honestly I’m surprised it didn’t become a ghost town like Tumblr did after they banned porn.
Mastodon will go nowhere because most instances are run by losers who want to shield themselves from instances with different opinions and defederate from thousands of instances for little reason.
The most likely replacement will be threads or bluesky
So the replacement for something that everyone has heard of, is something that no one has heard of?
Are you the genius behind replacing Sierra Mist with Starry?
Isnt Threads part ox instagram? So they already have a large userbase to target.
And that userbase hated the hell out of Threads
It already was prior to Musk’s takeover.
It’s just always been a cesspool. A complete waste of human energy and time. And it never once turned a profit. An abject failure by every metric.
It already was prior to Musk’s takeover.
It’s crazy how media pretends Twitter wasn’t the biggest contributor to Trump’s MAGA movement, being the most followed user on the site up until his fanatic followers stormed the US capitol. I mean did people already forget these dreadful years of “Trump tweeted” headlines every single day??? Twitter has been an enemy to democracy for many years.
I don’t know how you can say that was anti-democratic, though.
That level of open and direct communication from the sitting president is very democratic. Say what you will about the content of that communication, but Twitter did not act undemocratically by allowing the president to speak freely…
And it never once turned a profit.
Not true.
Twitter was profitable at the time when that Elon guy bought it (and before, and some time after).
Also you could follow actual people like artists and niche hobby groups. It had a purpose. I mean, a passable one. Not anymore
‘Undermining democracy’ is still a purpose
He’s absolutely fine with that. If anything, he represents the other side of tech billionaires, the illuminated technocrat. He thinks he’s above the other social parts at a certain extent, so he’s fine with anti-democracy arguments as long as they support his view of the world, including the idea that he’s that saviour of us all, through technology, of course.
Removed by mod
We watching how daft Elon is in real time, and his fan boys and girls are still trying to tell us he’s smart…
One of my coworkers swears he’s just the biggest troll and this is all some part of his masterplan.
It’s because he’s wanted to make X a thing since 2000. Even if he was being a troll, it’s not a joke if he’s just making everyone miserable. That’s not humour, it’s an anti-social weirdo and his dipshit followers thinking that hurting other people is funny.
A 42 billion troll. He’s King Clown in a hateful circus. Masterful.
Masterplan to accomplish what, exactly?
He thinks this will somehow get Grimes to come back to him.
No idea, he can never give me an answer about that.
…worst platform for disinformation…
Is that a double negative, or am I hallucinating ?
Its just very weirdly written
English professor: It’s impossible for a double positive to be negative.
Random student: Yeeeah, riiight…
Should be “worst platform at handling disinformation”
Now that makes sense.
When did we collectively decide techbro billionaires should be the arbiter of what is and isn’t disinformation?
When we decided that freedom of speech was a core freedom, and the wealthiest people own the biggest megaphones. Musk’s Twitter is just a reflection of the same system that protects the Murdochs, Chatham Asset Management, etc. The bar for “this speech is illegal” is extremely high in most first-world countries, at least unless your disinformation can be shown to harm important corporations (fraud) or rich people with really really good lawyers (defamation) or the justice system itself (perjury, filing false reports), it’s basically impossible to fight. This weakness of the justice system was why everybody was happy to see amoral corporations like Twitter taking up the project pre-Musk.
Remember, the only people who managed to extract consequences for The Big Lie from the above organizations is Dominion Voting Systems, a huge corporation that could show damages.
As long as the facts of our shared reality are considered beneath protection unless they coincide with the financial interests of VIPs, shitty people with big megaphones will lie with impunity.
A pension fund is standing in line to be next after dominion, because they’re investors and Fox hurt their investments by lying so badly that they had to pay
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/12/media/fox-corporation-new-york-city-oregon-lawsuit/index.html
When we decided to gather in their websites in large masses and ignore our common sense
Well, we gave the people with the money the power to decide everything else that’s important so why not that too?
Musk probably sees this as a confirmation it’s working as intended.
This is completely unsurprising. Under the new “free speech” regime, X has been completely deluged with antisemitic, pro-Russia, and anti-democracy propaganda. It’s no wonder that advertisers don’t want to be associated with that type of content.
Removed by mod
“Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech” Noam Chomsky
I think, you miss: LGBT-Z phobic, pro-oil and even babies eaters.
It’s a (re)public(an) town square.
Just fucking ban it already
Muskovite works in the service of Moscow.
Just imagine one could complain about the last remaining posts of this dying platform!
Surely it can’t be worse than Truth Social or Rumble… I’m assuming they mean mainstream platforms
(they’re not)
