The enshittification of the internet follows a predictable trajectory: first, platforms are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. It doesn’t have to be this way. Enshittification occurs when companies gobble each other up in an orgy of mergers and acquisitions, reducing the internet to “five giant websites filled with screenshots of text from the other four” (credit to Tom Eastman!), which lets them endlessly tweak their back-ends to continue to shift value from users and business-customers to themselves. The government gets in on the act by banning tweaking by users - reverse-engineering, scraping, bots and other user-side self-help measures - leaving users helpless before the march of enshittification. We don’t have to accept this! Disenshittifying the internet will require antitrust, limits on corporate tweaking - through privacy laws and other protections - and aggressive self-help measures from alternative app stores to ad blockers and beyond!

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      The message needs to reach as many people as possible, especially non-techies. The question is why aren’t more platforms used as vehicles?

      • Nix@merv.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The defcon link exists for people who don’t want to use YouTube. I like the message reaching more people so I like that YouTube is also used.

    • akwd169@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know right, it has its uses but for me at least the written word is so much more efficient… I almost never watch YouTube videos but I consume hundreds of articles every week

    • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI summary from Kagi:

      Cory Doctorow gives a talk about how platforms like Facebook start out benefiting users but eventually abuse them to extract more value for shareholders. He calls this process “insidification” and outlines the 3 stages platforms go through. Doctorow advocates for policies that promote adversarial interoperability between services to limit consolidation and give users more choice. He argues this can help build a new, better internet by decentralizing control away from giant companies. Doctorow is optimistic that recent antitrust actions may help reverse the trend of insidification. However, more remains to be done to establish strong constraints on companies that prevent them from abusing their users and customers.