lysdexic@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoMost UI Applications are Broken Real-time Applicationsthelig.htexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down16cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up120arrow-down1external-linkMost UI Applications are Broken Real-time Applicationsthelig.htlysdexic@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareTerrorBite :veripawed3:@meow.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year ago@verdare @lysdexic they are, but you have to be an enterprise customer. https://ubuntu.com/blog/real-time-ubuntu-is-now-generally-available https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/iot/iot-enterprise/soft-real-time/soft-real-time RTOS are not going to become consumer operating systems, because there’s too much value in selling it as a capability to enterprise customers (who are largely the consumers who REQUIRE a RTOS, rather than it merely being a convenience).
minus-square0x0@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoHow can it be convenient for the desktop user to severely limit the amount or running processes? Desktop usage scenarios are the opposite of RT usage.
@verdare @lysdexic they are, but you have to be an enterprise customer.
https://ubuntu.com/blog/real-time-ubuntu-is-now-generally-available
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/iot/iot-enterprise/soft-real-time/soft-real-time
RTOS are not going to become consumer operating systems, because there’s too much value in selling it as a capability to enterprise customers (who are largely the consumers who REQUIRE a RTOS, rather than it merely being a convenience).
How can it be convenient for the desktop user to severely limit the amount or running processes? Desktop usage scenarios are the opposite of RT usage.