• bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    The problem with floppy discs is that they are performing a service that price gouging private contractors could be doing. Unfortunately there are still government agencies that are saving tax dollars by sticking to so-called “legacy” systems that are well understood and are as near to perfected as they can ever be.

    It’s just unfair competition. How can they compete with old tech that just works. And works without an LLM shoved in it… hell, they don’t even need to connect to a company server!

    Tech bros will see to it that every aspect of the public sector is loaded down with broken enshitified proprietary spyware garbage that require regular service subscriptions.

  • Lutra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    System has been running on floppy disks for 50 years… people : “Floppy disks are not reliable!”

    <sigh>

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Old tech is solid and reliable. Do you really want the modern tech ethos of “move fast and break stuff” to apply to Air Traffic Control? I wouldn’t trust the big tech companies to write software for red-lights without killing people.

    • halloween_spookster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Old tech still requires maintenance and replacement parts. This tech is so old that they can’t effectively provide either. I 100% agree with you that you don’t want to “move fast and break things” but there does need to be a program to upgrade over time to deal with the maintenance and replacement problems, as well as improve capabilities and safety. The fact that some ATC systems completely crashed in recent months, leaving air traffic in a very dangerous state, is evidence of this problem.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I grew up with floppy discs. Once we had hard shells on them they were fine. I never had one fail.

        Did have some MBR viruses back in the day though.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Moving away from floppy discs in 2026 is moving fast and breaking things? Peak Lemmy moment.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The floppy disk is 60 years old. In which universe is migrating away from 60-year-old technology “moving fast and breaking stuff”?!

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not so much that new tech is bad … new tech could be made to be ten times safer than what we have now.

      The problem is that the new tech is controlled by psychopaths who want to squeeze as much profit out of everything imaginable … imagine all that new tech controlling air traffic but its all locked up by proprietary software that would hold entire airports, agencies and governments hostage, or be made available to the highest bidder and even for international opponents or enemies … and all of it up for grabs for profit and regardless of morals, ethics or human decency.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Floppy discs reliable? I remember mine not working if I transported them in my backpack when it was cold outside. They came back to life when “thawed”, but I’d prefer airliners use something better!

          • username_1@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You don’t have copyright-scmiopyright permission to read it anyway. It isn’t in the public domain – 100500 years haven’t passed for that.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        These don’t get transported like that. We’re talking climate control and backups and so on. It’s reliable because the failure rates and causes are known and accounted for.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You don’t understand what I mean, floppy discs lose memory easily. It’s not a safe storage medium. Everyone who has used them knows this. Use the paper with holes in instead 😁 can’t be that hard to push some kilobytes onto it 😂

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Lol.

            Everyone who has used them knows this.

            I started out on 8" floppy disk back in the day when disks were actually floppy. Switch to 5.25" and then 3.5" before going to CD-ROMs.

            Back then people were storing them in paper sleeves (or cardboard) and your average kid was handling them with dirty hands and ignoring pretty much anything and everything that caused them to degrade including touching the interior film. I fondly remember using the spring loaded shutter or a 3.5" as a fidget toy.

            I’m well aware of the failures these things have and the way they are required to be kept to account for that including backups, and care instructions.

            The point isn’t that they fail. They have known failure rates and known failure causes. Protocols can be put in place to account for literally all of that and this is what makes the medium reliable and cost effective for this use case.

            You’re talking to someone who was loading navigation data and software updates onto planes with 3.5" floppy until fairly recently in their career.

            This is as much about the hardware in use as it is about the storage medium. Upgrading depends on some things.

            Cost

            Upgradability path availability over full on replacement and the downtime of doing so.

            The ability to make what you are upgrading to stable, secure, and backwards compatible to a degree.

            All of those things have to be taken into consideration and accounted for.

            https://vger.to/infosec.pub/comment/24545251

            • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Lol I’m a senior software engineer and I used 5" floppies I mean it was in my post if you read it or maybe it’s your memory that has run its course 😱 (BTW people ruined floppies putting their thumb on the read area, or ruined them by fidgeting with the 3"5 ones, what’s your point about that?) no need to come to the rescue of an ancient crap organisation (computer wise) or is it yours or something 😂

              • atrielienz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                One of us works in this industry and understands what’s going on and the other of us is currently trying to throw their weight around because they didn’t like an anecdote and didn’t read the article.

                If we’re going to start throwing around ageism, I’m done with this conversation. You have a nice day.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Other countries would be horrified to hear that critical infrastructure had been so neglected, but this is just another day in the US of fucking A

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s way more common than you think.

      If something works then you don’t need to fix it.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There was actually a benefit to being behind the curve on this.

      The scheduling is done on modern machines, the actual flight control console is a glorified comms station with a very beefy audio recorder.

      It’s built to last, and to be as reliable as possible, while still being repairable by a skilled technician.

      Any update needs to be as solid and reliable as what it replaces. That’s the key, not being advanced or some shit.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      It really is a crazy country. I can’t imagine the stress of living there.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s fairly typical of aviation around the world

      Old is safe, and if it’s reliable, why change it?

      We just add new layers on top of the old system

      For the record, whole lot of planes using floppy disks too

  • dou9m@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t trust it happening well under Trump so I’m going to take this as a sign to be prepared for far more crashes in the next two years.

    • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Apparently they believe an unreliable storage medium that hasn’t been manufactured in more than twenty years may not be trustworthy enough for a life critical system anymore. That, or finding “new” floppies is more expensive than making the switch…

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You need a computer to do a thing, ALL you want is the command prompt and thing doing.exe

      Can’t hack a floppy disk remotely, it’s the OG air gap

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That kind of bullshit thinking is why I have to do shitty half-assed solutions because I need to work around unsupported equipment that’s 50 years old and was EOL’ed three decades ago. At some point you absolutely should upgrade even if it isn’t broken.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The absolute #1 priority in aviation is safety. Old, stable systems are safer. Just add new systems in parallel for new features

        • 3laws@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It fact you just gave us the true answer.

          If it ain’t broke don’t fix it, so now when it breaks it can’t be fixed.

    • cdnk5@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lol I use software every day that was written in COBOL. It would cost billions to replace. So leadership never wants to add that expense to their budget so they just hobble along and leave it for the next people.

      • walden@wetshav.ing
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m pretty sure the software I use for work is written in COBOL too, but they’re currently in a multi-year rollout of a modern replacement. So that’s good, I guess.