eicker@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 hours agoIf Jensen Huang’s Wife Cuts Him Loose, She Could Get the Largest Divorce Settlement of All Time: A divorce could set her up with an epic windfall.futurism.comexternal-linkmessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1320arrow-down16
arrow-up1314arrow-down1external-linkIf Jensen Huang’s Wife Cuts Him Loose, She Could Get the Largest Divorce Settlement of All Time: A divorce could set her up with an epic windfall.futurism.comeicker@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 hours agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squareNewNewAugustEast@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-25 hours agoWhat is this bullshit title? The article is even worse. This is like 1950s mentality. She isn’t going to earn anything, she is not getting a windfall. She is a partner in their life marriage arrangement, and if the other partner leaves they will need to split up the partnership. How much remains to be seen, and negotiations will occur, but unless a pre-nuptial, she already has this.
minus-squareFreeposity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours ago She isn’t going to earn anything, she is not getting a windfall. California is a community property state. That means she is entitled to half of their combined wealth.
minus-squareNewNewAugustEast@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 hours agoYes, that’s my point. She is not getting a windfall, she already has it.
minus-squareFreeposity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·4 hours agoYou really think she has control of 75 billion dollars? HE doesn’t even have control of that 75 billion yet.
minus-squareNewNewAugustEast@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoMy point is how the article is written, if they cash out for 75 the partnership gets 75. If they want to call it a windfall its for both of them.
What is this bullshit title? The article is even worse.
This is like 1950s mentality. She isn’t going to earn anything, she is not getting a windfall.
She is a partner in their life marriage arrangement, and if the other partner leaves they will need to split up the partnership.
How much remains to be seen, and negotiations will occur, but unless a pre-nuptial, she already has this.
California is a community property state. That means she is entitled to half of their combined wealth.
Yes, that’s my point. She is not getting a windfall, she already has it.
You really think she has control of 75 billion dollars? HE doesn’t even have control of that 75 billion yet.
My point is how the article is written, if they cash out for 75 the partnership gets 75. If they want to call it a windfall its for both of them.