• Artisian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I have long been a fan of striking with labor directly benefiting your community, on a material level. But it’s definitely rare. Presumably this gives bad incentives to, say politicians? Other folks who could pressure the bus company?

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Bus drivers around me did that a couple years ago. (🇨🇦)

    Pretty effective when the transit company still has to pay for fuel and deal with public backlash if they try to intervene.

    • trashcroissant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Same! Probably the same area. Bus drivers are doing job action on the Island right now and as things get worse, I hope their union also directs them to do this.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Damn. Bus drivers in Japan are awesome. Canada, too, according to a sibling poster. Much respect.

  • max_max@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I like the Idea, but as far as I know that particular strike wasn’t them fighting for thier working conditions, just the company operating the busses wanted to protest a competitor entering thier “territory”. So they did free rides to undercut the new bus company

    • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, if it was the drivers themselves they wouldn’t be allowed in the depot. It’s not hard to lock a door

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    That’s cool but bus drivers have WAY MORE leverage than that. Full strike would have much greater effect, and leaving buses to block the traffic would be full stop for most traffic

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      A full strike directly impacts the public diminishing their support. It’s easier for citizens to support a fair-strike because it doesn’t impact their wallets. Not that they should - but some of the public will blame the drivers if transit just stops and they now can’t get to work.

      Simply refusing to take fares while maintaining services directly impacts the transit company by maintaining operating costs and cutting off their income, while allowing the public to continue going about their day.


      Leaving the busses in traffic just pisses everyone off and potentially bridges into personal liability for the drivers.

      Plus they’ll just tow them out of the way.

      • alapakala@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        not if you’re blocking the suites exits and entries.
        imagine the embarrassment it would form if the neighborhood knew the chief of the bus company fucked the city, and couldn’t travel.

    • Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They do, but malicious compliance while not impacting regular users is a smart alternative to the nuclear option. Why use all your powder on the first shot if this method might work.