• Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Youu’re unintentionally right. When someone else doesn’t own you or everyone else. Then you are actually free. So yeah, owning yourself and your own destiny.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Owned

        v. owned, 0wned, pwned, 0wn3d, pwn3d, own3d.
        v. tr.
        To be made a fool of; To make a fool of; To confound or prove wrong; embarrasing someone: Being embarrased.
        I owned you in counter-strike. You were owned at the party yesterday.

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes you don’t understand it. We understand that. Though by your own definition you regularly own yourself too.

          • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Checks out, an Anarchist™ would certainly be an advocate of self harm and self oppression. After all, the billionaires seem all for the idea, and they must be the smartest people on earth. /s

            • Eldritch@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Go actually look up what anarchists believe and are for. If you want to make assumptions about them.

              • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I don’t think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it.

                • Eldritch@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Nah, actually you don’t disagree with most of them. Unless they’re nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don’t want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don’t take you for a statist.