• John Colagioia@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I forget whether it’s through the data page or somewhere else, but I gather that they’ve always made it pretty straightforward to grab the questions/answers/comments. For a while, web searches were a mess, because of all the fly-by-night outfits syndicating all conversations with SEO trickery to sell ad space.

  • Kissaki@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    A popular book doesn’t receive new pages either.

    Maybe Stack Overflow is “complete” or “stable”? :)

    • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This is the issue.

      It wanted to be a repository of knowledge. People used it like a forum. Instead of capitalizing on that disconnect by having a place for those questions they just shut it down, which alienated many people.

  • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And in about 2017 they started with “ThIs Is A DuPlIcAtE QuEsTiOn”, while pointing to a 10 years old answer.

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It was around 2017 my questions just stopped getting answers. Even if it wasn’t closed, I’d just get nothing. Eventually gave up asking.

      • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Like every experience, where I tried to actively engage with StackOverflow, was entirely negative. It was good for finding knowledge, but the moderators eventually killed it by this very behavior. This is also why you see the growth stalling, which should not happen. ChatGPT was only the final nail in the coffin and even made the existing knowledge disposable.

        Sometimes I wonder how many of the StackOverflow moderators were also Reddit moderators.

  • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I rather liked stackoverflow, and was fairly popular in the electronics one. I never found it overly rude, but there absolutely were certain individuals who were.

    I mourn its inevitable passing; I haven’t found anything that worked as well as it did, and the fact that you can get the data dumps is awesome.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I did like browsing the Popular page and diving into interesting questions in the various sub-sites. One sad, under-discussed consequence of AI is that people no longer turn to each other for expertise (since the AI knows it all), which previously brought people together into communities like SO.

  • mpdarkguy@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Why ask when You can search? If You don’t find it, then you probably thought about the problem the wrong way!

    I was only ever taught to search. Asking was for the class

  • modeh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Tried using StackOverflow back in my college days and was confronted by a barage of people practically telling me I am stupid fuck in subtle and not so subtle ways. I am sure people on there being rude and demeaning didn’t help their case.

      • modeh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Graduated summa cum laude…no thanks to them. I dedicated my degree to all the random Indians who had STEM related topics on youtube. Those guys dragged my ass throguh college for sure.

  • ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    Stack Overflow has been nearly useless as anything other than an archive of old questions for a long time. It’s a case study in how gamification can backfire.

    For me it was over was before the peak as shown. The gamification that got it started in the first place eventually led to it becoming almost unusable for its intended purpose. Instead it functioned as more of an online-only augmented reality game where people worked to moderate away new questions as efficiently as possible rather than actually answer questions.

    • delmain@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly, and the data shows that too. The number of questions were falling ever since the ‘game’ of the site became being able to shut down new questions with a variation of “this is a duplicate” in the exact mix of mean/demeaning/dismissive that would get the most clicks.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Silver lining of the AIpocalypse, honestly. That place could be pretty awful.

    *Closed and marked as duplicate of [deleted].

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I asked a handful of questions there and allways got really nice answers. Does it matter that people need less help these days?

    Seems good to me that AI can take care of the easy questions.