X revokes paid blue check from United Auto Workers after strike called::After a report called out Musk’s union-busting, UAW’s blue check got reinstated.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    As if they’re not openly making plans to do precisely that to to visibly queer people. Guess we don’t need to worry about the Nazis because they’re doing things in a slightly different order this time around, right?

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a thread about a far-right asshole going after unions with whatever he has at this disposal.

    • locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a pretty bold allegation. Any proof or are you just slippery sloping the shit out of a blue check mark?

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We aren’t talking about Florida. This is about X.

          Or who did you mean by “they”

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            this was answered already, but since you don’t seem to get it the first 5 times, “they” refers to far right actors, such as Musk.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was genuinely confused but now I’ve realized that I stumbled into some polarized red vs blue nonsense that I have no intention of continuing. I don’t make it a habit to group reds and blues together and collectively pin everything on the group.

              Politics is a sham and arguing red vs blue is actually the problem.

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh great, a radical centrist. Someone who thinks good is just as bad as evil, and lies are just as good as facts.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Read about Project 2025. The far is right is announcing its intentions to anyone who will listen.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait, we jumped from X removing a blue check mark to the far right spouting nonsense? That’s a huge leap

          • teuast@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Have you heard the things Elon says, or seen the people he signal boosts, or heard of the people and groups he associates with? It’s about as big of a leap as me getting out of bed in the morning, specifically back when I lived in a treehouse and slept on the floor.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No I haven’t. But I definitely know that no one is throwing visibly queer people in work camps in the USA.

              I’ve since discovered that this is a red vs blue powered issue, which makes this discussion moot. Throwing rocks for any reason at the other color isn’t useful. I vote third party and stay out of red vs blue.

              • teuast@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, if you had heard the things Elon says, seen the people he signal boosts, or heard of the people and groups he associates with, then you would understand why people are accusing him of spouting far right nonsense. It’s because the things he says are frequently far right nonsense, the people he signal boosts are frequently people who spout far right nonsense, and the people and groups he associates with are frequently significant sources of far right nonsense. And I’m not a Democrat in any sense other than thinking they’re not as bad for the world as Republicans are, but I can think of at least one good reason to throw rocks at “the other color,” that being when they’re propagating harmful far-right nonsense. I’d have thought this logic would be bulletproof, but I find myself cowed by the counterargument that “I have no idea what you’re talking about but you seem mean.”

                Paying attention to the world around you is a great way to avoid making yourself look silly, if you’re interested in stopping it from happening again.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            it’s not really a huge leap. Musk is literally part of the group, trying to pull it off.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Elon Musk is trying to send visibly queer people to concentration camps? Is there proof of this or is this just some red vs blue nonsense?

              • orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                one could take what Elon did “for” the queer people on Twitter, or one could take his comments about his child, or one could take the things his trans child said about him.

                once again, this shit doesn’t start with the concentration camps, that is where it ends.

                and the dehumanizing, delegitimizing, vilifying, and smearing is the point we are at now.

              • orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                As I told someone else already, it didn’t start with concentrations camps, nor genocides, it started with efforts to delegitimize, to communally ostracize. and the man who organized it all? he didn’t hate the Jews, the Sinti, the Roma, the Socialists, the “degenerates”, etc… no Eichmann just didn’t care, one of the greatest systematic destruction of human lives was organized by someone who just didn’t care. to him, it was just a question of “this is what the current (brown) side wants”

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      As if they’re not openly making plans to do precisely that to to visibly queer people.

      Who is “they”?

          • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Far right isn’t the same as right wing. Right wing could be a liberal. Far right is where you start sorting people by their “worth” instead of letting people discover that for themselves.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Far right implies further to the right? How is liberalism which relies on a basic notion of individualism in the same category as ethnonationalism which relies on a basic notion of collectivism?

              • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Far right doesn’t mean more “liberalism”, it means to the right of liberalism. right wing and left wing describe a spectrum within liberalism. Far right and far left are when you step outside the boundaries of liberalism. Whether that takes the form of collectivism or individualism isn’t really material to whether it’s outside the liberal spectrum. What is material is the belief in the democratic process and capitalism.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So the more centrist the more individualist, and the closer to the extremities the more collectivist? That’s not a perspective I’ve heard before. But I guess what I question again is then what makes something right wing? Leftwing is usually described as vaguely Marxist- but how is a monarchist and a fascist in the same category?

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The usual thing it means to people who follow politics. I’m not gonna explain basic vocabulary to you.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which is what? Monarchist? Liberal? Fascist? Those three things are described as right-wing sometimes but are all contradictory.