About a week or two ago, I started noticing that I could no longer copy the clean links for search result hits on Google. I thought it was maybe some quirk of a browser I was using, but today when trying to copy a link to a Youtube video, I realized it was actually rolled out globally (it seems).

Basically instead of getting a
https://youtube/. com/watch?v=-ed6UeDp1ek link now through google, (spaced out link to avoid AutoMod) you will get
https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAES<rest-of-encrypted-blob-containing--versionByte-keyID-cipherText>

The article describes the change in technical detail, and mentions a fix, but the author has kept it private for now so Google doesn’t patch it up (like they probably will or have for this workaround relying on the “Translate Page” feature with a different Browser Language selection [Twitter Link, Aug 27]).

Why it will probably be patched:

Surprised there’s no post about it here already.
Only Hackernews article I could find (4 days ago):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506338

Edit: It seems to matter a lot whether your network is deemed “spammy” or problematic by Google for the encrypted URLs to kick in, even if you’re logged out. Funnily enough my google searches went back to normal a few hours after I posted this. So a logged out session might get the regular, unencrypted links if your IP network has a good rating on Google’s end. Mine often runs into captchas and the like, so it makes sense why I’d be targeted by this new change.
Then again, I just tested on my mobile cellular on a logged out search, and I still have the goto’s. Can’t really control that.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 day ago

    So google has no problems unleashing their bots on others but they don’t want to get scraped themselves?

    That’s the sort of shit that should get your company disbanded in any functioning civilization.

        • Randelung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          And it’ll even sometimes show relevant results!

          Seriously though, noai.ddg is my default, but I still have to switch to google way too often.

          • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            21 hours ago

            i haven’t had to switch to google in years. when I can’t find something it’s usually because I am looking for something from over a decade ago that nothing can find. I guess you have to search differently with alternative search engines, and I still have that proficiency.

  • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    an underrated feature in duckduckgo is easily toggling between international search results and local (my country) search results. both are things I want often, but I much more rarely want to select any other country, so it makes sense for the toggle to work the way it does. also noai duckduckgo is a blessing.

      • raina@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I must be coming close to ten years of using DuckDuckGo and barely ever even needing the ! g bang. It might not be the galaxy brain option, and I do keep looking around, but the classic UX and the AI controls certainly improve navigating this hellscape.

  • axx@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Log in and your results are still clean links, so this has spread through scraper people and nobody else.

    Nobody else? Screw you, corporate fanboy.

    • Danitos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just a heads up, Ecosia relies on you clicking on Microsoft and Google provided ads for its revenue.

      From there FAQ:

      Do we plant trees if we don’t click on ads?

      Like other search engines, we make money when people click on the ads shown in our search results. […]

      How does Ecosia compare to other search engines?

      […] We provide industry standard search results together with our partners Google and Bing. […]

    • onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just tried Ecosia again after a long while (I last tried it around sometime in early 2020/21) and it seems a lot nicer and better than before. I’ll use it for a little bit then :$

    • kazerniel@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I used Ecosia for a few months last year, but it really struggled with more niche topics and searches in Hungarian. Also it kept re-enabling the AI search every other day, no matter how many times I disabled it. So in the end I switched to noai.duckduckgo.

    • alakey@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Stopped using them after being pestered by cloudflare garbage every 2nd visit despite having cookies enabled for it.

  • cx40@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    I got this too a few weeks ago and couldn’t find any information on how to convert the address back to normal. I guess it makes sense if most people don’t get those results. My fix was to just use a different search engine.

    fyi, I got it while I was logged in.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’ve probably not seen it. It only happens when you’re logged out.

    Heh, I haven’t seen it because I don’t use google.

    • onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wasn’t aware of Qwant. It seems to build its own index instead of relying on other providers (great), and has proper backing to be a viable competitor in something so big (the French government seems to endorse it; along with institutional use in EU parliament?).
      I just tested it and unfortunately got a 403 however (FORBIDDEN). Though I was behind an endpoint of a very popular VPN for some testing, that sucks regardless.

      Actually, before I could post this, I tried the search refresh and it worked somehow.
      To test again I switched to another server of the same VPN provider (same selected country) and tried searching. Same error, which didn’t go away after doing the refresh. So they might have some sort of spam prevention measure which eases itself automatically, but I feel like it could definitely be implemented better if that’s the case.

      Edit: Yep, if you sit on that 403 page for 5-6 minutes without doing anything and then hit the relaunch your search button, things work as intended afterwards.

      • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        turn off your adblocker

        edit: lmao why so many downvotes? this is what qwant does when you use an adblocker

          • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            if you have a good adblocker, you can turn it off for sites that have responsible policies with privacy and advertising and are barely scraping by as it is.

            if you can’t turn your adblocker for specific sites, get a better one. ublock origin is great.

            in case you can’t stand ads and need an ethical search engine get something like kagi. you have to pay for it but these websites can’t operate for free. don’t leech off companies that are struggling.

        • onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I tried without uBlock Origin on my end and it did indeed work. I incorrectly assumed it was my vpn without properly verifying. Though CactusEcho said there were problems without the adblocker so it may be inconclusive.

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Glad we have stuff like Startpage and Kagi, which are both better than Google anyways. There’s also Qwant, but it’s not as good as Kagi or Startpage.

    • punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just tried a test search with Qwant and Startpage. On mobile they returned the exact same results (which were good), which suggests that Startpage is using Qwant there. On desktop though, Startpage was hot garbage. Not a single relevant result on page one, with nearly half being links to Facebook and Instagram. Hard pass on that.

      I tested this on mobile too. Opened a Firefox private browsing window, switched to desktop mode and tried the search term on Startpage again. Same trash results as desktop. It’s like they’re actively telling desktop users to piss off.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I am not sure how they “clean” it. If you put in a youtube link or amazon, they can easily clean it because they just need to remove everything after the ?

      E.g, https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ becomes https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ

      However, by google doing this, you’re forced to check the link to see what the redirection even is. By the time you click to share that, you’re already tracked.

    • deleted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like it so much, and it’s my go-to search tool. Sometimes it struggles to identify official websites, but that only happens in about 1 out of every 100 searches.

      I wish it had image search though.