The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoThis seems like a bad long-term strategylemmy.worldimagemessage-square44linkfedilinkarrow-up1349arrow-down10 cross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up1349arrow-down1imageThis seems like a bad long-term strategylemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square44linkfedilink cross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-squareliking625@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·21 hours agoOnly a single rule is needed. If mass layoffs need to happen, the top person responsible, the CEO, must also leave the company in the same fashion.
minus-squarefeannag@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·20 hours agoWithout a golden parachute.
minus-squarecosmos8188@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·19 hours ago…B…b.ut the yacht can stay. Right?? Some bilionare
minus-squarekablez@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·20 hours agoWhat about a trial by combat clause? CEO has to fight one representative of the workforce. In America this could be a whole new genre of reality tv! We could call it… Luigi’s Mansion.
Only a single rule is needed. If mass layoffs need to happen, the top person responsible, the CEO, must also leave the company in the same fashion.
Without a golden parachute.
…B…b.ut the yacht can stay. Right??
What about a trial by combat clause? CEO has to fight one representative of the workforce. In America this could be a whole new genre of reality tv! We could call it… Luigi’s Mansion.