• lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yeah, no jack no thanks …

    Not a deal breaker for others but it is for me. Their rationale saying that the USB-C is more resilient than the jack is weird because I’ve never had the jack fail and even if it does isn’t that why you’re selling a repairable phone to me …?

    Anyways, I see they’re selling earbuds so I’m going to assume that that’s their main motivator.

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      because I’ve never had the jack fail

      Interesting, when I was still using wired headphones I’ve never had a jack survive the lifetime of the phone, and only on my Nexus 5 was I able to replace it

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve had several 3.5mm jacks fail. I’ve yet to have a USBC port fail, but I’ve also had fewer USBC ports and for fewer years.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ve had them both be problematic. Nothing deoxit can’t fix.

        Headphone jacks have a hell of a lot of leverage on that port. An IP68 headphone jack is honestly pretty bulky.

        I’d rather have one. I also also like us to go back to phones that are 1cm+ thick and just fill it out with battery.

    • ArtificialLink@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Whatever reason q company give for now headphone jack is always bs. Its plain and simple they wanna sell you their wireless earbuds.