• virtualbriefcase@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Or some other other solution to be determined by the state in question”

    Gulags, generally speaking

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, people who burn food during a famine should be rehabilitated, and prisons were the method (that doesn’t work) that people thought was effective to that end at the time.

      • aport@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, people who burn food during a famine should be rehabilitated

        And what of people who steal food during a famine, like the bolsheviks?

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          People should steal food from hoarders to redistribute it to starving peasants actually.

          If youre talking about grain quotas they stopped taking grain out of the region and started importing food when they realized there was a famine.

          • aport@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            People should steal food from hoarders to redistribute it to starving peasants actually.

            I agree, but the quota on kulak liquidation led to starving peasants being targeted.

            If youre talking about grain quotas they stopped taking grain out of the region and started importing food when they realized there was a famine.

            After millions of people had already starved to death. A minor but necessary bump in the road toward industrialization, I’m sure.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              After millions of people had already starved to death. A minor but necessary bump in the road toward industrialization, I’m sure.

              It wasn’t necessary. They could have foreseen the need for an independent commission to verify the numbers that local officials were reporting. They could have cracked down harder on sabotage of planting and harvesting and the mass slaughter of livestock by kulaks.

              Industrialization was necessary. If they didn’t push hard for industrialization we might all be speaking German right now. They cut it close to the wire and the mistakes that they made resulted in mass suffering. But there were no more famines with the exception of post ww2 after that famine, in an area that previously frequently had famines, because collectivization worked once the kinks were worked out.

              • aport@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Rapid industrialization at the cost of millions of lives was only a necessity because Stalin insisted on Socialism in One Country.

                Had proletariat revolutions not failed elsewhere, especially Western Europe, there would be no need for such a haphazard and reckless transition.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Okay but how was the soviet union to create a global proletarian revolution? They had to work with what they had.