• HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Nuclear material decays and as it decays, will not detonate with the energy from the explosive material it was built with. It NEEDS to be replaced on an regular basis, depending on the type it is. It’s not a matter of a chance o-ring dry rotting or chance capacitor leaking or chance fuel going bad.

    That’s 1940s technology.

    Putin’s a bully. There’s an implicate threat that Putin will use nukes if he doesn’t get what he wants, but he’ll never be happy with what he has. The best case scenario is he croaks on his own because he’s too damn paranoid to let someone near him assassinate him. He’s probably scared shitless from the recent drone attack on his palace.

    Not sure why you included this because it’s irrelevant and I agree, but I guess if you had to get a quick soapbox Red Herring out, it’s not like I can stop you.

    Russia has blackmail on “The West.” That’s why they’re complicate. Politicians are self serving shits. If they cared about unnecessary deaths, they would have handled Covid better.

    More Red Herring soapboxing. Try to stay on topic with your next comment.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/22540-05-ukraine-could-not-have-kept-nuclear

      Therefore, the general permitted lifespan of our nuclear warheads is 12 years. When they remain in operation beyond the identified term of service, they become especially dangerous for the environment. Ukraine does not have specialized facilities, including the material and technological base, for the processing and production of nuclear warheads. Ukraine cannot create such conditions independently. In accordance with the non-proliferation of nuclear technology regime nobody has the right to provide Ukraine this kind of assistance.

      There’s more in there, but the gist is is that if Ukraine couldn’t have maintained the nukes they had then the USSR fell, I don’t think Russia could have either.

      My point in calling out Putin as a bully is that if he actually has working nukes, he will use then whether or not we abide by his threats or not.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        My point in calling out Putin as a bully is that if he actually has working nukes, he will use then whether or not we abide by his threats or not.

        You seem to be arguing against a position you imagine I hold rather than what I’ve explained.

        Every comment so far has been me trying to re-assert that position and you more or less ignoring it to put your straw man icing on the rest of your comment, like this here.

        It’s like debating if a house is on fire where one half of the debate thinks the other half is only talking about house fires because they think aliens are real, so they spend half their time disproving aliens.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          You assert that Putin will use Nukes if the west helps Ukraine too much. I assert that Putin would use Nukes regardless if he had them.

          • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Okay yeah that’s where we differ, and I don’t think we’ll be able to convince each other of our respective positions.

            The weird part is when you deviate to try to prove to me (and other readers) that Putin is a bully.

            Putin is very obviously a bully and worse, so it doesn’t make sense to tell me that.