• Lev@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Permissive licences should be the ones to fuck off entirely. GPL or death

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: there is a place for permissive licenses. A great example is reference code for open standards, eg. TCP/IP.

      • Lev@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Permissive licences are useful compared to copyleft ones only for unfree actors, which we should fight integrally at every step of the way

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, libraries should remain permissive IMO. Applications can be restrictive if they want to. I just don’t see any point in a copyleft library or framework.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          World runs on them though. I don’t mean business to consumer shit, all that can rot in hell. I mean business to business. There’s shit out there that’s incredibly niche, takes a ton of effort to develop, and there’s no way it would ever be achieved without a huge financial incentive (because it’s just so niche and it turns out paying tens or hundreds of people takes money). And someone’s gotta pay the people writing all your open source code so most of them need day jobs anyway, which will be difficult to have without any commercial software existing. Sometimes the “all our code is GPL, but you can pay us to host it for you” model works, but a lot of the time it doesn’t.