I was interested in finding out why Ford signed such a good contract with Canadian autoworkers. What I found wasn’t what I expected. But I do think it we can have something like a win-win if the country brings in Chinese EVs. Look at the numbers in my article and tell me what you think—.
https://open.substack.com/pub/billhulet/p/why-canada-needs-chinese-evs


For many people, the bike purchase isn’t disposable income. It’s in place of buying the much more expensive car. Sure, they’re fortunate enough to be able to live in a place where it’s doable … but people do it in Edmonton, Winnipeg, Montreal, Toronto. Even if people in these major cities leaned more towards bikes, it would make a difference - and not just towards the global environment but to their local environment. The particulate matter from EV brake and tires is as bad or worse than ICE cars because of their extra weight.
I’m honestly concerned by the number of you who don’t seem to be able to understand the points above. Unfortunately, no, in a car dependent system, the purchase of a cargo bike over a car will always be less practical, even if it can be used practically. You cannot use it to travel between cities or suburbs easily, construction zones are not managed with them in mind, the very scale of our public space is designed around cars, which means that every distance will cost more in time and labour with the cargo bike even if your necessities and some luxuries are within the distance you are able to travel with it in the time that you have; good luck working 50hr swing shifts with this as your only transportation. Regardless of what city you’re in and what options you have available, the reality that this system is car-dependent means that anyone who must maximize the value in large purchases because they do not have money to spare is coerced into purchasing a car as they simply cannot afford the loss in utility that comes with a cargo bike. You can tell that most people in this community are middle-class are above, because so many of you have clearly never had to actually worry about how you’ll get around and still get everything you need to get done done. Even if there are merits, every person who buys these does so out of privilege. People who cannot buy cars do not buy three thousand dollar bikes (for a cheap one, mind you). If you cannot get everything you need with this thing (which is over 90% of the people in this country), you need to be able to afford it as well as another form of transportation, what sorts of people do you think can do that? Getting really tired of you people pretending that the working poor, or even average people, do not exist.
Yes, I and many other people understand that car-dependency is bad, which is why it is concerning that so many of you seem so self-satisfied with the notion that individualized moral consumerism somehow contributes to ending car-dependency. Most people in this country do not live in these cities. We all know bikes cause less pollution across the board, we all watched Captain Planet in the fuckin’ '90s; people do not make choices differently from you just because they are ignorant, stupid, or less moral than you are. You think this hasn’t ended yet why, because everyone in this society is just so morally corrupt and apathetic that they just choose for this to continue?
Car-dependency is precarity, it is vulnerability. It exists because it makes this system more effectively coercive over workers exactly because it is so expensive and transformative of space. Great for you that you can afford to pretend you can change it by buying a product; I wonder who benefits from such an easy solution.