• cavitationfetishist2@quokk.auBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    Even if you’re a total slop-fucker this makes sense; the point of Debian is long term stability and uptime.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Also, AI code can’t be copyrighted. If the code can’t be copyrighted, then open source licenses can’t be enforced on it.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        By that logic they would have to ban all public domain code.

        It’s also not always true. Unmodified AI output can’t be copyrighted, but if AI was only used as a tool and there is still significant human input, e.g. because the AI output needed some manual editing afterwards, it is copyrighted.